How long could a holdover school board's new superintendent contract run after the board's elected term expired?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2003. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
Concordia Parish School Board members remained in office after their terms expired because the board's reapportionment plan had not received federal preclearance for elections. When the superintendent retired, the board asked whether a new superintendent's contract could run two years from the new appointment or only two years from the board's expired term. In Opinion 03-0363, the AG chose the expired term. A new contract could not extend beyond December 31, 2004, two years after the members' official terms ended on December 31, 2002.
The opinion distinguished the members' continued service, or tenure, from the legal term of office. Holding over kept the board functioning but did not restart the statutory clock limiting the superintendent's contract.
Currency note
This opinion is dated November 14, 2003. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
What the opinion meant at issuance
School board
La. R.S. 17:54(B)(1) allowed a superintendent term up to four years but no later than two years after the electing board members' terms expired. Because the members' official terms ended on December 31, 2002, the AG fixed December 31, 2004 as the outside end date for this board's new contract.
Superintendent candidate
The board could still elect a new superintendent while holding over. The opinion said a later appointment date did not grant an additional two years beyond the stated end date.
Common questions
Did holding over extend the board members' official terms?
No. The AG said their tenure continued, but their official term had expired.
Could the board sign a contract through two years after hiring?
Not if that would pass December 31, 2004. The AG measured from the board members' expired term.
Was the board unable to fill the superintendent vacancy at all?
No. The opinion discussed the board electing a new superintendent, with the statutory limit on the contract's end date.
Background and statutory framework
La. R.S. 17:54(B)(1) limited superintendent contracts by the electing board's term of office. The AG also quoted La. R. S. 1:3 on reading statutory language in context and discussed holdover officers under the Louisiana Constitution. Those sources supported separating the legal term from continued service pending a successor.
Citations and references
- La. R.S. 17:54(B)(1): superintendent contract term limit.
- La. R. S. 1:3: statutory interpretation.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinions
- Original PDF: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinion/Download/03-0363
Original opinion text
~t~te ol
One American Place
301 Main Street, Suite 600
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. Box 94005
CIVIL DIVISION
TEL.: (225) 342-7013
BATON ROUGE
FAX: (225) 342-2090
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
70804-9005
ATTORNEY GENERAL
flOV 1 4 2003
OPINION NO. 03-0363
94 - SCHOOLS & SCHOOL DISTRICTS -
Administration, Government & Officers
La. R. S. 1:3
La. R.S. 17:54(B)(1)
La. R.S. 17:54
Mr. Earnest Lynn White, President It is the opinion of this office that the contract term for a Concordia Parish School Board new superintendent should not be extended beyond a period of two years from the expiration of the board
Post Office Box 950
member’s term of office, which in this case is December
Vidalia, Louisiana 71373-0950 31, 2002.
Dear Mr. White:
This office is in receipt of your opinion request wherein you inquired about the maximum term of employment the Concordia Parish School Board could offer a new school superintendent. Specifically, you sought our opinion relative to La.
R.S. 17:54(B)(1) and its applicability to the Concordia Parish School Board which has not held elections because the United States Justice Department has not precleared the school board’s reapportionment plan. The board’s term was set to expire on December 31, 2002. The former superintendent retired, leaving the post vacant and therefore requiring the school board to elect a new superintendent. You questioned whether the contract term for a newly appointed school board superintendent should be a period of two years from December 31, 2002 or a period of two years from the date the new superintendent is chosen.
La. R.S. 17:54 (B) (1) provides, in pertinent part:
Notwithstanding the provisions of La. R.S. 42:3, each city and parish school board shall elect a superintendent of schools.., for a period not to exceed four years, which period, however, may extend no longer than two years after the expiration of the term of office of the membership of the board electing the superintendent (Emphasis supplied).
The Louisiana Civil Code Article 11 states that:
The words of a law must be given their generally prevailing meaning. Words of art and technical terms must be given the technical meaning when the law involves a technical matter.
Page 2
Mr. Earnest Lynn White, President
Concordia Parish School Board
Opinion No. 03-0363
Page 2
Further, La. R. S. 1:3 reads as follow:
Words and phrases shall be read with their context and shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language. Technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in the law, shall be construed and understood according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning.
It appears that the members of the Concordia Parish School Board are "holding over" until given preclearance by the United States Department of Justice. "Holding over" is a term given to public officers when "... they [public officers] are to continue in office after the expiration of their official terms until their successors are duly qualified. Under the rule authorizing an officer to hold over, it has been said that he or she may do so where there has been a failure to hold an election to choose a successor." 63C Am. Jur. 2d Public Officers and Employees
§ 149. Louisiana Constitution of 1974, Art. 14, §15, provides that:
(A) person holding office by election shall continue to exercise his powers and duties until his office is abolished, his successor takes office or the office is vacated, as provided by law. A person holding an office by appointment shall continue to exercise his powers and duties until his office is abolished, his term ends, or he is removed or replaced under the provisions of this constitution or by law. Each public body shall continue to exercise its powers and duties until changed as provided by this constitution or by law.
Although your school board members are holding over, the Board’s term officially expired December 31, 2002. In examining this issue, a board member’s term must be distinguished from a board members’ tenure. According to Parish of Plaquemine, State ex rel. Wilkinson v. Hinqle, 1909 WL 1545:
The term of an office is distinct from the tenure of the incumbent.
The one has reference to the time during which an officer may claim and hold the office of right; the other means simply the time during which he actually remains in office.
Although the Board’s tenure has not ended, their term has expired according to statute. In accordance with La. R.S. 17:54, a new superintendent’s term cannot exceed two years following the expiration of the electing board’s term. Therefore, if your board elects a new superintendent, the contract may not extend beyond two years from December 31, 2002, or beyond December 31, 2004.
Page 3
Mr. Earnest Lynn White, President
Concordia Parish School Board
Opinion No. 03-0363
Page 3
In conclusion, it is the opinion of this office that the contract term for a new superintendent should not be extended beyond a period of two years from the expiration of the board member’s term of office, which in this case is December 31,2002.
We hope this opinion sufficiently addresses your questions. If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Assistant Attorney General
RPI:VLH:Irs
What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2003. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace