Could Kenner collect referendum petition signatures through the mail?

Short answer The AG said mailed-in signatures did not meet the Election Code petition rule then in force. The statute required information identifying the person who witnessed and obtained each signature, which the AG read as requiring personal circulation.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 01-71
Issued
March 9, 2001
Issued by
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General of Louisiana
Requested by
John T. Lavarine, III, Kenner City Council

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2001. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory and are not binding court precedent. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

A Kenner council member asked whether civil service referendum petitions could be mailed to voters for signing and return. The Attorney General said this method did not conform to the Election Code provision that applied to petitions submitted to registrars for certification. He read R.S. 18:3's requirements for the person who witnessed and obtained each signature as calling for personal circulation.

The AG explained why an older opinion had accepted mailed initiative or referendum signatures: at that time, no applicable procedural rule governed them. A later enactment added R.S. 18:3, changing the answer for petitions subject to that statute.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2001. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could voters mail back signed referendum forms under the rule the AG applied?
No. The AG said signatures gathered that way did not conform to R.S. 18:3.

Why did the AG require personal circulation?
The statute required the name and date of the person who witnessed and obtained the signature. The AG concluded that those requirements could not be met by gathering signatures through the mail.

Had the AG previously allowed mailed referendum signatures?
Yes. The opinion distinguished an older answer given before the Legislature enacted the petition procedure in R.S. 18:3.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion reviewed older AG opinions on recall and initiative petitions, then applied R.S. 18:3, enacted in 1986, to petitions submitted to registrars of voters for certification. It noted a statutory exception for local option petitions, but the Kenner request concerned a civil service referendum.

Citations and references

  • R.S. 18:3

Source

Original opinion text

March 9, 2001
OPINION NUMBER 01-71

Hon. John T. Lavarine, III
Councilman, District 2
City of Kenner
1801 Williams Boulevard
Kenner, Louisiana 70062

Dear Councilman Lavarine:

We are in receipt of your request for an Attorney General’s opinion regarding referendum petitions. Specifically, your request seeks an opinion as to the feasibility of submitting petitions for a civil service referendum within the City of Kenner to the registered voters via mail, understanding that the petition would have to meet the Louisiana Constitution and all state criteria.

In Attorney General Opinion Nos. 84-131-A and 86-784, our office concluded that recall election petitions must be personally circulated. In Attorney General Opinion No. 85-411, which was distinguished from our opinions on recall petitions, we concluded with regard to an initiative/referendum petition “[t]hat where persons sign petition forms out of the presence of a circulator of the petition, and mail the petition form in, such constitutes a valid signature to the petition and should be counted to determine if the requisite number of signatures has been accomplished to require that the proposition be placed on the ballot.” This 1985 opinion was based on the fact that there was no state provision in either the Constitution or Revised Statutes, or local home rule charter which provided guidelines to determine the procedural requirements which must be followed in order that signatures to a petition to amend a home rule charter be deemed sufficient. Nor did an initiative/referendum petition fall within the recall category which by law required technical and procedural conformity for the harsh remedy in the removal of a public officer.

Since these opinions, the law has changed. Louisiana Acts 1986, No. 669, enacted R.S. 18:3, which provides guidelines for all petitions submitted to registrars of voters, with the exception of local option petitions. R.S. 18:3 provides, in pertinent part:

A. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, every petition submitted to a registrar of voters for certification shall contain the following information:


Page 2

Hon. John T. Lavarine, III
Opinion Number 01-71
Page -2-

(1) The signature of the voter who is signing the petition; however, if a person is unable to write, the incapacitated person shall affix his mark to the petition and the person circulating the petition shall affix the name of the incapacitated person provided he does so in the presence of two witnesses who shall also sign their names as witnesses to the mark.
(2) The date the voter signed the petition.
(3) The signer’s ward/district/precinct and date of birth.
(4) The address at which the signer is registered to vote, including municipal number, apartment number, rural route, and box number.
(5) Name of the signer either typed or legibly written.
(6) Name of the person who witnessed and who obtained the signature.
(7) Date on which the person witnessed and obtained the signature.


(Emphasis added)

We must, therefore, conclude that the Election Code contemplates that all petitions subject to the requirements of R.S. 18:3 be personally circulated; otherwise, the requirements of R.S. 18:3 could not be met. In sum, it is our opinion that signatures that have been gathered via the United States mail would not be in conformity with the provisions of R.S. 18:3.

If we can be of further assistance in the future, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Yours very truly,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENERAL

ANGIE ROGERS LAPLACE
Assistant Attorney General

RPI/ARL


Page 3

Hon. John T. Lavarine, III
Opinion Number 01-71
Page -3-

OPINION NUMBER 01-71

33 ELECTIONS – Special Elections – Tax Bonds 71-1-B MUNICIPALITIES – Home Rule Charter

The gathering of signatures for a referendum petition via the United States mail would not be in conformity with law.

Hon. John T. Lavarine, III
Councilman, District 2
City of Kenner
1801 Williams Boulevard
Kenner, Louisiana 70062

DATE RECEIVED:
DATE RELEASED: March 9, 2001

ANGIE ROGERS LAPLACE, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2001. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace