What powers did an elected Louisiana police chief have over investigations, spending, and town records?

Short answer The AG said investigations needed a legitimate basis, police spending had to fit the approved budget and warrant rules, and the town clerk kept municipal records including vehicle titles. He allowed off-duty security work but referred the discount-card ethics question elsewhere.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 01-68
Issued
March 21, 2001
Issued by
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General of Louisiana
Requested by
Mike Grimmer, Mayor of Walker

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2001. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory and are not binding court precedent. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

Walker's mayor asked seven questions about an elected police chief's authority. The Attorney General said the chief and parish sheriff shared authority to investigate crimes within town limits, but an investigation of the mayor or an alderman required a legitimate basis for believing an offense had occurred. An investigation without that basis could be an abuse of authority.

The AG also addressed police spending and records. After a police budget was appropriated, the chief controlled day-to-day allocation within the department, but expenditures still had to follow the town's appropriation and warrant rules. The chief could authorize an officer to open an account for budgeted police items, but not charge the town directly outside those rules, and could designate someone to sign vehicle titles for budgeted purchases. The clerk, rather than the chief, was the town's official record keeper and should retain police vehicle titles.

For off-duty work, the opinion said a town officer could provide security for Wal-Mart on days off. The AG referred the separate question about accepting a discount card to the State Commission on Ethics for Public Employees and did not decide it.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2001. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could the chief investigate the mayor or an alderman at will?
The AG recognized authority to investigate criminal violations in town, but said there had to be a legitimate basis for believing an offense occurred.

Could the chief or an officer create charges for the town?
The chief could authorize an account for items within the police budget and payable through warrants. The opinion said this did not authorize charges made directly to the town outside that process.

Who kept police vehicle titles?
The AG said the town clerk should keep the titles because police vehicles were municipal property.

Could a town officer work private security on a day off?
The AG said yes. He separately declined to answer whether officials could accept Wal-Mart's proposed discount card, referring that ethics question to the state ethics commission.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion used R.S. 33:423 for the chief's enforcement authority, R.S. 33:462 for expenditure and warrant requirements, and R.S. 33:421 for the clerk's recordkeeping duties. It treated the chief's operational authority and the clerk's custody of municipal records as compatible roles.

Citations and references

  • R.S. 33:423
  • R.S. 33:462
  • R.S. 33:421

Source

Original opinion text

March 21, 2001
OPINION 01-68

Mayor Mike Grimmer
Town of Walker
P.O. Box 217
Walker, LA 70785

Dear Mayor Grimmer:

This office is in receipt of your request for an opinion of the Attorney General in which you question various aspects of the authority of the Town's Chief of Police. In this regard you ask the following questions:

1. Can an elected Chief of Police at his will authorize a criminal investigation of the elected Mayor and his office? If so, by what statutory authority and by what procedure. If not, what recourse does the Mayor have?

2. Can an elected Chief of Police at his will authorize a criminal investigation of the elected Alderman? If so, by what statutory authority and by what procedure? If not, what recourse does the Alderman have?

3. Can an elected Chief sign or authorize one of his officers to sign a contract or sign to open a charge account that will incur monthly charges for the Town?

4. Can an elected Chief of Police sign or authorize one of his officers to sign titles for the purchase of new or used police vehicles?

5. Can a policeman working for the Town of Walker on days off work extra duty for Wal-Mart? If so is it ethical for policeman, Mayor, Alderman or Chief to accept a 10% discount charge card from Wal-Mart?

6. Is the official record keeper for a Lawrason Act municipality, the Town Clerk, Mayor or Chief?


Page 2

Mayor Mike Grimmer
OPINION 01-68
Page 2

7. Can an elected Chief of Police retain official records such as titles to vehicles or should those records be maintained by the Town Clerk?

In response to your first two questions, this office has recognized that the parish sheriff and municipal policemen of a Lawrason Town share the authority to investigate criminal violations occurring within the municipal limits of the municipality, citing the authority for the Chief of Police set forth in R.S. 33:423. However, the authority to investigate must have a legitimate basis to justify the belief that an offense has been committed requiring an investigation or such an investigation could constitute an abuse of authority.

In regard to your question whether the Chief of Police can authorize one of his officers to sign a contract or sign an open charge account that will incur monthly charges for the Town, we find it pertinent to recognize that the elected Chief of Police is the final authority in the day-to-day operation of his office and equipment in regard to carrying out his duties. Once the mayor and aldermen have budgeted and appropriated money for the police department, the authority to allocate the expenditures of these funds rests with the elected chief of police. However, R.S. 33:462 requires all expenditures of these municipal funds be made pursuant to a specific appropriation with all warrants drawn on the treasury expressing on its face to whom it was issued, for what purpose and the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the warrant.

Accordingly, the Chief of Police under his inherent authority to operate his department could authorize one of his officers to open a charge account if the charges are for items authorized under the police department's budget to be paid with warrants, but not for charges directly to the Town.

The response to your inquiry as to whether the Chief of Police can authorize one of his officers to sign titles for the purchase of new or used police vehicles would be the same as that to your prior question, in that under the authority to control the day-to-day operation of the Department, the Chief could designate an individual to sign for vehicle titles, but the expenditure for the vehicles must be included within the Department's budget and paid by warrant.

We find in answer to your fifth question that a policeman working for the Town of Walker can work extra duty for Wal-Mart on his days off from the police department. This office stated in Atty. Gen. Op. 97-80 that "law enforcement agencies may engage in the practice of scheduling 'off duty' officers or allow the officers themselves to contract to provide security to private or public entities". It was further observed therein that there did not appear to be any obstruction that would block the officer from using police issued equipment.

As to your further inquiry if it is ethical for policemen, the mayor, aldermen or Chief to accept a 10% discount charge card from Wal-Mart, we would refer you to the State


Page 3

Mayor Mike Grimmer
OPINION 01-68
Page 3

Commission on Ethics for Public Employees which is located at 8401 United Plaza Blvd., Suite 200, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, (225) 922-1400 for such an inquiry.

In regard to your question whether the official record keeper for a Lawrason Act municipality is the Town Clerk, Mayor or Chief we find retention of records depends in part on what type of records are involved. However, in accordance with R.S. 33:421 which sets forth the duties of the Clerk, we would conclude he would be considered the official record keeper of the municipality. It is provided in this statute that the clerk shall keep a book labeled Municipal Minutes in which he shall record the proceedings of the Mayor and Aldermen, and he shall keep a book styled Municipal docket wherein he shall enter each subject matter to be acted upon by the mayor and board. Additionally, it is provided "he shall keep such other books and records as may be provided by ordinance", and "shall file in his office and preserve all records and papers pertaining to the business of the municipality."

In your final question you ask whether the Chief of Police should retain official records such as titles to vehicles or should those records be maintained by the Town Clerk. We would conclude, inasmuch as this office has recognized that the vehicles of the Police Department are municipal property, that the titles should be kept by the Town Clerk. We do not find that this would interfere with the inherent authority of the elected Chief of Police to operate his department.

We hope this sufficiently answers your inquiries, but if we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely yours,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Attorney General

By:_________
BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General

RPI/bbr


Page 4

Mayor Mike Grimmer
OPINION 01-68
Page 4

OPINION 01-68

77 - Officers - Local & Municipal
R.S. 33:462
R.S. 33:421

The Chief of Police is the final
authority in the day-to-day
operations of his office and
equipment. A municipal police
officer can work private security
when off duty. The Town Clerk
shall keep all records pertaining
to the business of the municipality.

Mayor Mike Grimmer
Town of Walker
P.O. Box 217
Walker, LA 70785

Date Received: Feb. 21, 2001
Date Released: March 21, 2001

BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2001. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace