How did Louisiana calculate a withdrawing candidate's qualifying-fee refund when a clerk's fee applied?

Short answer The AG selected the method that first halved the qualifying fee, then subtracted the additional clerk fee. In the request's $300 fee and $30 clerk-fee example, the refund was $120 under the 2000 law.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 00-104
Issued
April 17, 2000
Issued by
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General of Louisiana
Requested by
Frances Hurst, Administrator, Louisiana Secretary of State's Office

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory and are not binding court precedent. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of State's office was preparing a candidate withdrawal form and asked how to account for a clerk's fee when refunding qualifying fees. The Attorney General chose the first proposed calculation: divide the qualifying fee in half, then deduct additional fees imposed by law. With the office's $300 qualifying fee and $30 clerk-fee example, that produced a $120 refund.

The opinion reasoned that R.S. 18:501(B) refunded part of the qualifying fee, not additional state central committee, parish executive committee, or clerk fees. The timing conditions quoted in the opinion governed whether any refund was available under the 2000 statute.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2000. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

What was the refund in the $300 and $30 example?
The AG's selected calculation was $300 ÷ 2 = $150, then $150 − $30 = $120.

Did the AG deduct the clerk fee before halving the amount?
No. He rejected the alternative that would first subtract the $30 fee and then halve the remaining amount.

Did the opinion say a candidate withdrawing at any time received a refund?
No. It quoted R.S. 18:501(B)'s deadline conditions for a qualifying-fee refund under the law then in force.

Background and statutory framework

The request presented two proposed methods for a Notice of Candidate's Withdrawal or Removal. The AG compared the refund rule in R.S. 18:501(B) with R.S. 18:464(E)'s clerk-fee provision and decided that additional fees were not themselves refundable.

Citations and references

  • La. R.S. 18:501(B): refund of qualifying fees upon a timely withdrawal.
  • La. R.S. 18:464(E): clerk's fee provision.

Source

Original opinion text

April 17, 2000
OPINION NUMBER 2000-104

27 Elections Candidates, nomination & eligibility to run
Frances Hurst, Administrator
R.S. 18:501(B) and 18:464(E)
Elections, Commissions & Publications
Secretary of State’s Office
The proper method to use in refunding qualifying fees in your
example #1 where you refund ½ of the qualifying fee, then you
P. O. Box 94125
deduct any additional fees imposed by law for the final refund
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9125 amount [qualifying fee ÷ 2 = amount – additional fees = refund amount].
Dear Ms. Hurst:

We are in receipt of your request for an Attorney General’s opinion regarding the refund of qualifying fees. Your letter states that your office is in the process of preparing a Notice of Candidate’s Withdrawal/Removal form stating the proper procedure to be followed regarding the refund of candidate qualifying fees pursuant to La. R.S. 18:501(B) and La. R.S. 18:464(E). You seek an opinion on the following question:

Which method [example 1 or 2 for State Senator, qualifying fee of $300] should be used to determine the exact dollar amount the office of the Secretary of State should refund to a candidate if he/she is subject to a processing fee to the clerk of court?

Example 1: $300 qualifying fee ÷ 2 = $150 -$30 (clerk’s fee) = $120 refund to candidate

Example 2: $300 qualifying fee - $30 (clerk’s fee) = $270 ÷ 2 = $135 refund to candidate

La. R.S. 18:464 provides for the payment of qualifying fees, and provides in pertinent part, as follows:

A.


B. Amount of qualifying fees. The qualifying fees for candidates in primary elections are:
(1) For state candidates -- …
(2) For local candidates -- …
(3) For municipal candidates -- …
(4) For candidates for membership on state central committees …
C. Additional fees imposed by state central committees …


Page 2

D. Additional fees imposed by parish executive committees...
E. Clerk’s fees. Each clerk of court may retain from the qualifying fees of each local and municipal candidate and each candidate for membership on a political party committee a fee of not more than ten percent, but not less than ten dollars, which shall be retained by the clerk and used by him to cover his office expenses for filing and recording the candidate’s qualifying papers. However, the sums retained by the clerk of court shall be retained only from those qualifying fees that are remitted to the secretary of state.

    • *(Emphasis added)

La. R.S. 18:501(B) provides:

B. Refund of qualifying fees. If the withdrawal is filed prior to the fifty-sixth day before the election, fifty percent of the qualifying fee paid by the candidate shall be refunded by the state treasurer from the escrow account in which these deposits were credited. If the withdrawal if filed on or after the fifty-sixth day before the election, the deposit shall not be refunded. However, if the fifty-sixth day falls on or before the seventh day following the last day for qualifying, the candidate shall have until the seventh day following the last day for qualifying to receive such a refund. (Emphasis added).

It is our opinion that the clear language of the law allows for the refund of qualifying fees and not additional fees imposed by the state central committees, the parish executive committees, and the clerks of court. Therefore, the proper method to use in refunding qualifying fees is your example #1 where you refund ½ of the qualifying fee, then you deduct any additional fees imposed by law for the final refund amount [qualifying fee ÷ 2 = amount – additional fees = refund amount].

We hope this opinion addresses your concerns. If we can be of further assistance, please advise.

Yours very truly,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENERAL

ANGIE ROGERS LAPLACE

RPI/ARL;cwr


Page 3

Summary:

27 Elections Candidates, nomination & eligibility to run

R.S. 18:501(B) and 18:464(E)

The proper method to use in refunding qualifying fees in your example #1 where you refund ½ of the qualifying fee, then you deduct any additional fees imposed by law for the final refund amount [qualifying fee ÷ 2 = amount – additional fees = refund amount].

Frances Hurst, Administrator
Elections, Commissions & Publications
Secretary of State’s Office
P. O. Box 94125
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9125

DATE RECEIVED:

DATE RELEASED: April 17, 2000

Angie Rogers LaPlace
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2000. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace