Could Louisiana's agriculture department keep voluntarily supplied trade secrets and business data confidential?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry asked whether confidential business information it received through its regulatory work was exempt from public disclosure and whether the relevant state exemption resembled federal FOIA. The Attorney General said the described trade secrets and commercial data, obtained by voluntary agreement and designated confidential and privileged, qualified under the cited Louisiana provisions.
The AG tied the answer to LDAF's investigative duties and to the character of the records. He said the federal exemption for confidential trade secrets and commercial or financial information effectively paralleled Louisiana's exemption for the specific circumstances presented.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2000. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Were all business records held by LDAF automatically confidential?
The opinion did not state a blanket rule. It addressed records meeting the cited conditions, including the department's investigative role and a voluntary agreement designating the records confidential and privileged.
What types of information did the AG discuss?
The opinion named trade secrets and commercial data obtained in connection with LDAF's regulation of seed and other propagating stock.
Did the AG say the federal and Louisiana exemptions matched for this request?
He said they effectively paralleled one another for the specific trade-secret and confidential-business-data circumstances discussed.
Background and statutory framework
The opinion quoted LSA-R.S. 44:4(3)'s exclusion for confidential private-business records held by a qualifying state agency and LSA-R.S. 49:956(8)'s description of confidential and privileged records in agency adjudications. It applied those provisions to LDAF's described receipt of business information through voluntary agreements.
Citations and references
- LSA-R.S. 44:4(3): confidential business records in qualifying agency custody.
- LSA-R.S. 49:956(8): confidential and privileged records in agency adjudications.
- LSA-R.S. 3:1431-1448: LDAF's seed and propagating-stock duties.
- 5 USCA §552(b)(4): federal FOIA exemption quoted in the opinion.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinions
- Original PDF: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinion/Download/00-0036
Original opinion text
March 3, 2000
OPINION NUMBER 00-36
Mr. J. Marvin Montgomery
OPINION NUMBER 00-36
Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry 90 - C Public Records
Post Office Box 631
LSA-R.S. 44:4; LSA-R.S. 44:4(3); LSA-R.S.
49:956(8); LSA-R.S. 49:956
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821
The Public Records Act's applicability to trade
secrets and confidential information.
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
You have requested an Attorney General’s opinion regarding the authority of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry (hereinafter “LDAF”) to receive and protect confidential business information from businesses regarding the introduction, movement or release of regulated articles in Louisiana.
Specifically, you ask whether this confidential business information received by the LDAF pursuant to its regulatory authority is exempt from Louisiana’s Public Records Act. You also ask whether any pertinent exemption to the Public Records Act under Louisiana Law is substantially the same as the exemption provided in the federal Freedom of Information Act for these purposes.
LSA-R.S. 44:4, in pertinent part, mandates:
This Chapter shall not apply:
(3) To any records, writings, accounts, letters, letter books, photographs or copies thereof, in the custody or control of any officer, employee, agent or agency of the state whose duties and functions are to investigate, examine, manage in whole or in part, or liquidate the business of any private person, firm or corporation in this state, when the records, writings, accounts, letters, letter books, photographs or copies thereof, pertain to the business of the private person, firm or corporation, and are in their nature confidential.
In Attorney General Opinion Number 89-598, our office interprets LSA-R.S. 44:4(3) to exempt information or documents from the right of public inspection if the following criterion are met: (1) the agency must be a state agency, (2) the agency must be charged by law with the duty to “investigate”, (3) the business practices of private persons, firms and corporations in this state, (4) which investigation requires the acquisition and custody of certain business records of private parties, and (5) those records must be designated “confidential.” Opinion 00-36
Page 2
Mr. J. Marvin Montgomery
Page 2
In that same opinion, our office cites LSA-R.S. 49:956(8) in order to determine what qualifies as confidential information for these purposes. LSA-R.S. 49:956(8), in part, states:
(a) Records and documents, in the possession of any agency or of any officer or employee thereof including any written conclusions drawn therefrom, which are deemed confidential and privileged shall not be made available for adjudication proceedings of that agency and shall not be subject to subpoena by any person or other state or federal agency.
(b) Such records or documents shall only include any private contracts, geological and geophysical information and data, trade secrets and commercial or financial data, which are obtained by an agency through a voluntary agreement between the agency and any person, which said records and documents are designated as confidential and privileged by the parties when obtained, or records and documents which are specifically exempt from disclosure by statute.
LSA-R.S. 49:956 applies to adjudication proceedings of state agencies. The LDAF is a state agency charged by law to investigate and examine the business practices of private persons, firms and corporations in this state, specifically those business practices that relate to the growing, harvesting, processing, preparing, labeling, distributing, marketing, certifying, or registering seed and other propagating stock in Louisiana. LSA-R.S. 3:1431-1448. This investigation requires the acquisition and custody of certain business records of these private persons, firms and corporations that may be considered confidential, as they are trade secrets and commercial data.
Moreover, you state this information obtained by the LDAF through voluntary agreement between itself and the private entity is designated confidential and privileged in that documentation. Consequently, the definition of confidential information provided in LSA-R.S. 49:956(8) is applicable and exempts that acquired information.
Finally, 5 USCA §552(b)(4) states the Federal Freedom of Information Act does not apply to “trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.” For the specific purposes discussed above, this exemption effectively parallels the Louisiana’s exemption regarding confidential and privileged data including trade secrets and certain restricted commercial information. Opinion 00-36
Page 3
Mr. J. Marvin Montgomery
Page 3
I trust this addresses your concerns. Please contact this office if you require further assistance.
Sincerely,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:_________
CARLOS M. FINALET, III
Assistant Attorney General
RPI:CMF/mb
Page 4
Syllabus
OPINION NUMBER 00-36
90 - C Public Records
LSA-R.S. 44:4; LSA-R.S. 44:4(3); LSA-R.S. 49:956(8); LSA-R.S. 49:956 The Public Records Act's applicability to trade secrets and confidential information.
Mr. J. Marvin Montgomery
Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry
Post Office Box 631
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821
Date Received:
Date Released: March 3, 2000
CARLOS M. FINALET, III
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2000. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace