Could a Kentucky realtor board add questions to the state seller disclosure form?

Short answer No. In 1993, the AG said only the Kentucky Real Estate Commission could add items to its seller disclosure form. A private realtor group could use a separate supplemental form, but the state statute and regulation did not require sellers to complete it.
State
Kentucky
Opinion
OAG 93-68
Issued
October 14, 1993
Issued by
Chris Gorman, Attorney General of Kentucky
Requested by
John L. Ackman, Jr., General Counsel, Kentucky Real Estate Commission

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current Kentucky law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Kentucky Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory and are not binding court precedent. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In 1993, Kentucky's Attorney General said local realtor boards could not add questions to the official seller disclosure form adopted by the Kentucky Real Estate Commission. KRS 324.360 gave the Commission, rather than private associations, authority to decide what additional conditions the form had to cover. The Commission's regulation required the statutory categories and allowed a seller to provide other information voluntarily.

The AG distinguished changes to the official form from a separate form a private association might adopt. A private group could use its own supplemental form alongside the Commission's form, but the seller could not be required by KRS 324.360 or the accompanying regulation to complete it.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1993. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Historical summary

Realtor boards and real estate companies

The AG said neither a local board nor a company had statutory authority to add questions to the Commission's official form. The opinion left room for a separate supplemental form, while clarifying that the state disclosure statute and regulation did not make sellers complete it.

Home sellers

The Commission form required disclosure of the conditions named by the statute and regulation, including the basement, roof, water, sewage and component systems. Sellers could voluntarily disclose other information or answer additional buyer inquiries under the language of the 1993 regulation.

Commission and licensed real estate professionals

The opinion located authority to add required conditions on the official form with the Commission. It said the Commission had chosen not to require further conditions at that time; that choice did not transfer the authority to private realtor groups.

Common questions

Could a realtor board add questions to the back of Kentucky's seller disclosure form?

The AG said no. Only the Real Estate Commission could add information to the official form.

Could a seller disclose more than the official form asked?

Yes. The regulation quoted by the AG expressly allowed a seller to volunteer additional information and respond to a buyer's additional inquiries.

Could a realtor association use a separate supplemental form?

The opinion said a private association could adopt one for use alongside the Commission's form. It also said neither the statute nor the regulation required a seller to complete that separate form.

What conditions did the 1993 official form cover?

The opinion listed basement and roof condition and leaks, water and sewage sources and conditions, and working condition of component systems. The regulation also covered plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling systems.

Background and statutory framework

The Real Estate Commission asked whether private companies or boards of realtors could add matters beyond its official disclosure form. KRS 324.360 directed the Commission to authorize a seller disclosure form and identified minimum categories. The AG read 201 KAR 11:350 as requiring those categories while allowing a seller to add information voluntarily. It concluded that only the Commission could expand required content on the official form.

Citations and references

  • KRS 324.360: statutory authority and categories for the seller disclosure form.
  • 201 KAR 11:350: Commission regulation and voluntary additional disclosure language.

Source

Original opinion text

OAG 93-68

October 14, 1993

Mr. John L. Ackman, Jr.

General Counsel

Kentucky Real Estate Commission

10200 Linn Station Road, Suite 201

Louisville, Kentucky 40223

Dear Mr. Ackman:

By way of previous correspondence and telephone conversations you, on behalf of the Kentucky Real Estate Commission, hereafter the Commission, have requested to be provided with an opinion ". . . on whether individual companies or boards of realtors can include additional matter above and beyond those included on the form adopted by the Commission under KRS 324.360."

Under the pertinent provisions of KRS 324.360:

(2) The commission shall promulgate an administrative regulation authorizing a 'seller's disclosure of conditions form.'

(3) The form shall provide for disclosure by the seller of the following:

(a) Basement condition and whether it leaks;

(b) Roof condition and whether it leaks;

(c) Source and condition of water supply;

(d) Source and condition of sewage service;

(e) Working condition of component systems; and

(f) Other matters the commission deems appropriate.

(Emphasis added.)

The above-cited statute was adopted by the 1992 General Assembly. In April of 1993, the Commission received final approval on 201 KAR 11:350 which sets forth the seller disclosure form to be used by persons licensed under KRS Chapter 324 when they receive compensation for their services which involve the sale of residential real property. According to the regulation, the physical condition of the basement, roof, water supply, sewage service, plumbing, electrical heating and cooling systems must be disclosed by the seller on the form set forth in the regulation. In addition, the regulation requires the form to include the following sentence:

THE SELLER MAY DISCLOSE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT REQUESTED OF THIS FORM AND MAY RESPOND TO ADDITIONAL INQUIRIES OF THE BUYER.

In comparing the provisions of KRS 324.360(2) and 201 KAR 11:350, the Commission chose to require a seller to divulge only the physical condition of those items of a house which are mentioned in the statute. However, in the regulation the Commission allows a seller to disclose additional information not requested by the form if he so chooses. In other words, the Commission does not require a seller to disclose any physical conditions of a house which are in addition to those set forth in the statute.

In response to the form described in the regulation, you have indicated that some local boards of realtors have inquired whether they could add some questions regarding the physical condition of the home to the back of the form.

As previously stated, the General Assembly, pursuant to KRS 324.360, requires that all persons licensed under Chapter 324 who receive compensation for sales and purchases involving residential real estate in this state must have their client, if he is selling real estate, complete the disclosure form described in the statute and accompanying regulations. In addition, the statute authorizes the Commission, but no other state or local agency or group, to add conditions to the form that it "deems appropriate."

In response to this authorization, the Commission chose not to require a seller to disclose any conditions in addition to those set forth in the statute. Instead, the Commission, in its regulation, authorized a seller, if he or she so chooses, to disclose any additional information which was not requested in the form, and he or she could respond to additional inquiries of the buyer. Nowhere in the statute was any authority given by the General Assembly to any entity other than the Commission to determine what information, in addition to that required by the statute, must be included on the disclosure form. Even though the Commission chose not to exercise that authority, that authority does not then pass from the Commission to any other state regulatory agency or a private association of realtors.

Therefore, since the General Assembly did not authorize the addition of any information to the seller disclosure form by any public or private entity, other than the Commission, no such additions may be placed on the form by any local board of realtors. This decision does not prohibit a private association involved with the sale of real estate to adopt a seller disclosure form which could be used in conjunction with the Commission's form. However, sellers could not be required by KRS 324.360 or the accompanying regulation to complete the form.

Yours truly,

CHRIS GORMAN

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Richard C. Carroll

Assistant Attorney General

What does Kentucky law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1993. Ezel checks the current Kentucky statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace