Can a Kansas county attorney be paid extra for temporarily covering the county counselor's job during a vacancy?

Plain-English summary

Linn County's counselor asked whether a county could legally pay its county attorney an hourly fee for the roughly 30 days the attorney spent covering the county counselor's job after the previous counselor resigned. The concern was an old rule, going back to an 1872 Kansas Supreme Court case, that a county attorney generally cannot be paid extra for performing duties the law already requires as part of the job.

The Attorney General concluded that rule does not apply here, because of how Kansas splits civil legal work between two offices. Counties can choose to create a county counselor position, and once they do, all the civil-side duties that would otherwise fall to the county attorney by law shift over to the county counselor instead. That means the county attorney's statutory job description no longer includes those civil duties, and the attorney's salary, set separately by the county commission, is not meant to compensate for them. So when the county attorney steps in temporarily to cover a vacancy in the county counselor's office, the attorney is doing work outside the county attorney's own required duties, the same kind of extra service the 1872 case said could be separately compensated. The opinion also leaned on two earlier AG opinions recognizing that counties can contract with a county attorney to handle some or all of the county counselor's duties, reasoning that the same logic supports paying an attorney who fills a temporary vacancy in that office.

What this means for you

Boards of county commissioners deciding how to cover a county counselor vacancy: the opinion holds you may contract with, and separately compensate, the sitting county attorney to perform county counselor duties on an interim basis, as long as the county counselor position itself remains established (not abolished) and the arrangement is genuinely temporary.

County attorneys asked to step in during a county counselor vacancy: the opinion confirms that doing so is work outside your own statutory civil-duty obligations (which shifted to the county counselor once that office was created), so accepting additional fees for the interim work does not violate the rule against being paid twice for the same required duties.

Common questions

Why can't a county attorney normally get paid extra for civil legal work?
Because Kansas courts, going back to an 1872 case, have held that a county attorney's salary is meant to cover all duties the law requires, so accepting extra pay for those same required duties is not allowed, according to the opinion.

Does that rule still apply once a county has its own county counselor?
No, according to the opinion, because creating a county counselor position shifts the civil duties away from the county attorney by statute, so those duties are no longer part of what the county attorney's own salary is meant to cover.

Does this only work for a truly temporary vacancy, or can it apply long-term?
The opinion addresses only the situation where a county attorney performs county counselor duties on a temporary basis due to a vacancy; it expressly declines to weigh in on whether one person could permanently hold and be paid for both offices at once.

Background and statutory framework

Kansas gives counties the choice to create a county counselor position under home-rule authority in K.S.A. 19-101a, with the office's duties enumerated in K.S.A. 19-247, covering advising the county commission, handling civil suits, drafting contracts, and performing "all the duties in civil matters that have previously been required by law of the county attorney." K.S.A. 19-248 confirms that once a county counselor is appointed, the county attorney is no longer required to represent the county in civil actions (apart from certain tax foreclosure suits). K.S.A. 19-702(a) and 19-704(a) set out the county attorney's own duties, including the traditional rule that the attorney gives opinions and advice to the county board "without fee or reward" as part of the job.

The opinion's key move was tracing what happens to those civil duties, and the compensation logic behind them, once a county counselor position exists but sits temporarily vacant. Since 1976, county attorney and county counselor salaries have both been set locally by boards of county commissioners under home-rule authority, and a prior opinion recognized a board could lawfully reduce a county attorney's salary once a county counselor took over civil duties, on the theory the attorney's pay now covers only criminal-side work. From that premise, the opinion reasoned that if a vacancy in the county counselor's office causes the county attorney to pick civil duties back up, even temporarily, the attorney is doing work the attorney's own salary was never priced to cover, making an additional fee appropriate rather than double-dipping on required duties.

Citations and references

Statutes:
- K.S.A. 19-247; 19-248; 19-249, 19-249a, 19-249b
- K.S.A. 19-702(a); 19-704(a); 19-705; 19-716
- K.S.A. 19-101a; 22a-105; 28-816

Cases:
- Commissioners v. Brewer, 9 Kan. 307 (1872)

Source

• Landing page: https://www.ag.ks.gov/reports-resources/ag-opinions
• Original PDF: https://www.ag.ks.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/22896/638747779237930000

Original opinion text

February 7, 2025

ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2025-4

Mark Hagen
Linn County Counselor
8655 College Boulevard
Overland Park, KS 66210

Re: Counties and County Officers—County Attorney—Opinions and Advice
to County

        Counties and County Officers—County Commissioners—County
        Counselor

Synopsis: When a county has established the position of county counselor and
there is a temporary vacancy in that position, a county attorney is not
prohibited from receiving a fee in addition to the county attorney's
salary for performing the duties of the county counselor on an interim
basis. Cited herein: K.S.A. 19-247; 19-248; 19-702; 19-704.

                        *            *            *

Dear Mr. Hagen:

As Linn County Counselor, you ask whether a county is prohibited from paying its
county attorney hourly fees when acting as county counselor on an interim basis.
Your question arises because last year, the previous county counselor resigned, and
the county attorney served as interim county counselor for approximately 30 days.

Answering your question requires an analysis of the statutes governing county
attorneys and county counselors. K.S.A. 19-704(a) provides:

    Except as otherwise provided in this section,1 the county attorney shall
    without fee or reward, give opinions and advice to the board of county
    commissioners and other civil officers of the county, when requested by
    such board or officers, upon all matters in which the county is
    interested, or relating to the duties of such board or officers, in which
    the state or county may have an interest.2

And K.S.A. 19-702(a) stipulates that "it shall be the duty of the county attorney to
appear in any court having jurisdiction within the county and prosecute or defend
on behalf of the people all actions and proceedings, civil or criminal, in which the
state or the county is a party or interested."3 The Kansas Supreme Court has long
held, going back to its 1872 decision in Commissioners v. Brewer,4 that:

    [W]henever the law requires the county attorney to perform any
    particular service or duty, he cannot receive or recover any
    compensation for the performance of such service or duty in addition to
    his salary and the specific fees allowed by statute. His salary is
    intended to be sufficient compensation for the performance of all
    services and duties required by law, except where the statute
    otherwise specifically provides for other or additional compensation.5

Counties may choose to (but are not required to) establish the position of county
counselor.6 As Attorney General Opinion 80-121 explained, upon appointment of a
county counselor "all duties in civil matters otherwise required by law of the county
attorney pass to the county counselor." K.S.A. 19-247 provides that a county
counselor shall:

    (a) When requested by the board of county commissioners or when
    necessary, attend the meetings of such board;

1 The exception in subsection (b) involves opinions and advice regarding the county hospital.
2 Emphasis added.
3 This statute also excludes representation relating to operation of the county hospital.
4 9 Kan. 307 (1872). The plaintiff in the case was David J. Brewer, who was suing to recover

compensation for legal services performed while he was Leavenworth County Attorney. Brewer had
joined the Kansas Supreme Court by the time of the lawsuit (although he did not participate in the
Court's decision). He later went on to serve as a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.
5 Id. at 317-18.
6 As Attorney General Opinion 80-121 noted, the appointment of a county counselor was previously

authorized by K.S.A. 19-246, but that statute was repealed in 1975. Appointment of a county
counselor is now based on a county's home rule authority, see K.S.A. 19-101a, although the duties of
a county counselor, once appointed, remain enumerated in K.S.A. 19-247.

  (b) give advice upon all legal questions that arise and assist the board
  on all legal matters referred to the county counselor;

  (c) commence, prosecute or defend, as the case requires, all civil suits
  or actions in which the county is interested and represent the county
  generally in matters of civil law;

  (d) draw all contracts and other papers required by the board of county
  commissioners and furnish to the board, when requested by it, opinions
  in writing upon legal matters pending before the board;

  (e) if applicable, perform the duties provided by K.S.A. 19-716, and
  amendments thereto; and

  (f) perform all the duties in civil matters that have previously been
  required by law of the county attorney of the county.

K.S.A. 19-248 states that "[u]pon and after the appointment of such county
counselor, the county attorney of such counties shall not be required to represent
said counties in any civil actions or business," with the exception of tax foreclosure
suits in certain counties.

Thus, if a county has not established the position of county counselor, a county
attorney may not accept a fee (apart from his or her salary as county attorney) for
representing the county in civil matters as required by statute. But we believe a
different analysis applies when a county has chosen to establish the position of
county counselor and the county attorney is performing the duties of the county
counselor on an interim basis due to a temporary vacancy in that position. In that
situation, the civil duties of the county attorney have passed to the office of the
county counselor. As long as the board of county commissioners has not abolished
the office of county counselor, but rather is seeking to fill a temporary vacancy in
that position, we do not believe the statutory duties of the county counselor revert
to the county attorney. And so the county attorney is not prohibited from accepting
an additional fee for performing those duties on an interim basis. As the Kansas
Supreme Court explained in Brewer:

  [W]here the county attorney performs services for the county which are
  not required of him by law, he may be paid therefor by the county the
  value thereof as though he were not the county attorney; and the
  county board may contract with him for the performance of such
  services as are not required of him by law, in the same manner and to

  the same extent as they could contract with any other person for the
  performance of such services.7

This conclusion is consistent with Attorney General Opinion 92-67. There, Attorney
General Stephan recognized that upon appointment of a county counselor, the
county counselor and not the county attorney would bear statutory responsibility for
civil proceedings such as child in need of care cases, forfeiture cases, involuntary
commitment proceedings, and habeas corpus matters. But because county
counselors are often hired for the primary purpose of providing legal advice and
handling contractual matters, not trial work, Attorney General Stephan recognized
that "it is reasonable that some counties which have a county attorney and a county
counselor may wish to enter into a contract wherein the county attorney would
handle all duties except advising the board of county commissioners and handling
contractual matters."8 In other words, it is permissible for a county attorney to
enter into a contract to perform certain duties assigned to the county counselor.
Likewise, we believe a county attorney may enter into a contract to perform the
duties of county counselor on an interim basis due to a temporary vacancy in that
office.

Our conclusion is also supported by practical considerations relating to the county
attorney's salary. Since 1976, county attorney and county counselor salaries have
been set by locally elected boards of county commissioners under county home rule
authority.9 In counties without a county counselor, the county attorney's salary
should encompass compensation for the county attorney's civil duties, so it would be
inappropriate for the county attorney to receive an additional fee for performing
those duties. But in counties with both a county attorney and a county counselor,
the county attorney's salary as set by the board of county commissioners will have
only been designed to provide compensation for those duties that have not passed to
the county counselor. In fact, Attorney General Opinion 85-147 concluded that it
would be permissible for a board of county commissioners to reduce a county
attorney's salary following the establishment of the position of county counselor to
reflect the fact that going forward, the county attorney's salary would only provide
compensation for handling criminal matters. Thus, when a county has established
the position of county counselor and the county attorney performs the civil duties of
the county counselor on an interim basis due to a vacancy in that office, it makes
sense to provide the county attorney with additional compensation for performing
those duties.10

7 9 Kan. at 318.
8 Attorney General Opinion 92-67.
9 See Attorney General Opinion 81-86. Before 1976, county attorney salaries were set out in K.S.A.
28-816, while K.S.A. 19-249, 19-249a, and 19-249b provided for the salaries of county counselors.
K.S.A. 22a-105 continues to set the minimum salary for district attorneys.
10 This opinion only addresses the situation where a county attorney performs the duties of the

county counselor on a temporary basis. We note that in Attorney General Opinion 74-337, Attorney

                                            Sincerely,

                                            /s/ Kris W. Kobach

                                            Kris W. Kobach
                                            Attorney General

                                            /s/ Dwight R. Carswell

                                            Dwight R. Carswell
                                            Deputy Solicitor General

General Miller concluded that a county attorney could be appointed as county counselor and receive
the salaries of both offices. We express no opinion on that conclusion, which is arguably inconsistent
with K.S.A. 19-705 ("nor shall any county attorney while in office be eligible to or hold any judicial or
other county office whatsoever"), a statute that was not addressed in that opinion.