Does working at Wichita State University qualify an employee for Kansas's aviation and aerospace tax credit?

Plain-English summary

Wichita State University asked whether it counts as a "qualified employer" under Kansas's Aviation/Aerospace Tax Credit, which gives eligible employees a $5,000 annual income tax credit for up to five years. WSU pointed to its National Institute for Aviation Research (NIAR), which does aviation and aerospace research, and to a training partnership that helps students become licensed Aviation Maintenance Technicians, as evidence its business "involves the aviation sector."

The Attorney General agreed with the Kansas Department of Revenue that WSU does not qualify. The statute requires that a qualified employer's "principal business activity" involve the aviation sector, and the opinion read "principal" to mean an entity's primary or predominant activity, not just any activity it happens to have. WSU's principal business, as the university itself acknowledged, is providing education broadly as a public research institution; its aviation-related programs, however real and substantial, do not predominate over its many other academic departments and activities. The opinion also rejected a looser reading of "involves" that would cover any tangential connection to aviation, explaining that interpretation would produce results the Legislature could not have intended, such as making the tax credit available to WSU's music department employees, or to an ordinary hardware store that occasionally sells parts to an aviation company. Reading the statute's title and its focus on graduates of aviation-specific programs, the opinion concluded the credit is meant for employers whose core business is genuinely in the aviation sector, which WSU as a whole is not.

What this means for you

Universities, hospitals, or other large institutions with an aviation-adjacent department or program: the opinion holds that having a real, substantial aviation or aerospace program is not enough to make the whole institution a "qualified employer"; the aviation activity has to predominate over the institution's other business, not just exist alongside it.

Employees hoping to claim the Aviation/Aerospace Tax Credit through their employer: the opinion clarifies that your employer's overall, primary line of business is what counts, so working in an aviation-adjacent department of a non-aviation employer (like a university's aviation research institute) does not by itself make you eligible if the employer's core business is something else.

Aviation and aerospace companies or contractors evaluating their own eligibility: the opinion's reasoning suggests employers whose main business is genuinely aviation manufacturing, maintenance, research, parts supply, or training, not employers who merely touch the industry occasionally, are the intended beneficiaries of this credit.

Common questions

Does having an aviation research institute make a university a "qualified employer" for this tax credit?
No, according to the opinion, unless that aviation-related activity predominates over the university's other business; WSU's aviation programs, while real, do not outweigh its broader educational mission across many other fields.

What does "principal business activity" mean under this statute?
The opinion defines it as an entity's primary or predominant business activity, the "most important, consequential, or influential" one, not merely any activity the entity happens to engage in.

Could WSU's aviation research institute itself, rather than WSU as a whole, ever qualify separately?
The opinion notes it does not address that question, since WSU's request concerned only whether WSU itself, as the employer of record, qualifies, not whether a specific department or affiliated entity might separately meet the definition.

Background and statutory framework

K.S.A. 79-32,290 through 79-32,293, enacted in 2022, created tax credits for aviation and aerospace employers and their employees, commonly called the K-26 credit after the relevant tax form. K.S.A. 79-32,293 gives "qualified employees" hired on or after January 1, 2022 by "qualified employers" an annual $5,000 income tax credit for up to five years. K.S.A. 79-32,290(g) defines a "qualified employer" as an entity, including a public entity, "whose principal business activity involves the aviation sector," with "aviation sector" defined broadly in subsection (c) to include manufacturing, maintenance, parts supply, research and development, and education and training of aviation and aerospace personnel.

The opinion applied ordinary dictionary meaning to "principal" (the entity's primary or predominant activity) and read "involves" in light of that context to mean "closely related to," not merely "contains as a part," reasoning that a looser reading would produce absurd results inconsistent with the statute's evident purpose, tying the credit to graduates of aviation-specific "qualified programs." The opinion also invoked the Kansas Constitution's requirement that a bill's subject be expressed in its title, noting the enacting bill's title (providing tax credits for graduates of aerospace and aviation-related educational programs and their employers) as further evidence the credit was meant for employers substantially engaged in the aviation sector, not incidentally connected to it.

Citations and references

Statutes:
- K.S.A. 79-32,290 (incl. (c), (f), (g), (h))
- K.S.A. 79-32,293

Cases:
- Midwest Crane & Rigging, LLC v. Kan. Corp. Comm'n, 306 Kan. 845, 397 P.3d 1205 (2017)
- State v. Strong, 317 Kan. 197, 527 P.3d 548 (2023)
- Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc., 227 Kan. 842, 610 P.2d 1107 (1980)

Source

• Landing page: https://www.ag.ks.gov/reports-resources/ag-opinions
• Original PDF: https://www.ag.ks.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/22860/638723796352530000

Original opinion text

July 2, 2024

ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2024-4

Stacia G. Boden, General Counsel
Wichita State University
1845 Fairmount St.
Wichita, KS 67260

Re: Taxation—Income Tax—Tax credit for graduates of aerospace and
aviation-related educational programs and employers of program
graduates; definitions

Synopsis: To be a "qualified employer" for purposes of the Kansas
Aviation/Aerospace Tax Credit, an entity's "principal business activity"
must "involve[ ] the aviation sector." This means that an entity's
primary or predominant business activities must be closely related to
the aviation sector. The fact that Wichita State University has some
connections to the aviation sector does not make it a "qualified
employer" when those ties do not predominate over its other business
activities. Cited herein: K.S.A. 79-32,290; 79-32,293

                               *                *               *

Dear Ms. Boden:

As General Counsel for Wichita State University (WSU), you ask whether WSU
meets the definition of a "qualified employer" under K.S.A. 79-32,290(g) such that
its employees may avail themselves of the Aviation/Aerospace Tax Credit1 under

1 This is also referred to as a K-26 tax credit based on the relevant tax form.

K.S.A. 79-32,293 if they otherwise qualify for the credit. The Kansas Department of
Revenue (KDOR) has concluded that the answer is no.2 We agree.

K.S.A. 79-32,290 through 79-32,293, which were first enacted in 2022,3 provide tax
credits for certain aviation and aerospace employers and employees. The tax credit
at issue in your question is established by K.S.A. 79-32,293, which provides an
annual $5,000 income-tax credit to "qualified employee[s]" for up to five tax years.
"[Q]ualified employee[s]" are full-time employees, with certain qualifications, hired
by "qualified employer[s]" "on or after January 1, 2022."4 A "qualified employer" is
"a sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability
company, corporation, other legally recognized business entity or public entity
whose principal business activity involves the aviation sector."5

WSU is a public entity, so whether it constitutes a "qualified employer" under the
statute turns on whether its "principal business activity involves the aviation
sector."6

Because the term "principal business activity" is not defined in the statute, we give
these words their "ordinary, contemporary, common meaning."7 "Principal" is
commonly defined as the "most important, consequential, or influential: chief."8 In
other words, "principal" refers to an entity's primary or predominant business
activity.

As you note, WSU's principal business activity is providing education as a public
research university. But you suggest this activity "involves" the aviation sector
because one of WSU's departments, the National Institution for Aviation Research
(NIAR), engages in aviation and aerospace research and development.9 WSU also
helps educate and train aviation and aerospace personnel, for instance by
partnering with WSU Tech to offer the GET TO WERX program. That program
assists students in earning degrees and certifications necessary to become Aviation

2 Letter from Ted E. Smith, Chief Counsel, Dep't of Revenue, to Dwight Carswell, Deputy Solicitor

General, Mar. 19, 2024 (on file with the Attorney General).
3 L. 2022, ch. 63, §§ 10-13.
4 K.S.A. 79-32,290(f).
5 K.S.A. 79-32,290(g).
6 The statute defines "aviation sector" as "a private or public organization engaged in the

manufacture of aviation or aerospace hardware or software, aviation or aerospace maintenance,
aviation or aerospace repair and overhaul, supply of parts to the aviation or aerospace industry,
provision of services and support relating to the aviation or aerospace industry, research and
development of aviation or aerospace technology and systems, and the education and training of
aviation or aerospace personnel." K.S.A. 79-32,290(c).
7 Midwest Crane & Rigging, LLC v. Kan. Corp. Comm'n, 306 Kan. 845, 851, 397 P.3d 1205 (2017).
8 Principal, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed. 2009).
9 Your letter states that the employees in question are employees of WSU and asks whether WSU is

a qualified employer. Thus, we do not address whether NIAR itself might be a qualified employer.

Maintenance Technicians, while working in NIAR's maintenance, repair, and
overhaul division.

The fact that these aviation-related programs are part of WSU's overall educational
activities does not mean that WSU's principal business activity involves the
aviation sector. While "involve" can mean "to have within or as part of itself," it is
also defined as "to relate closely: connect."10 We believe this second definition is
more apt here given the statutory context.11 K.S.A. 79-32,290(g) references an
entity's "principal" business activity, which, as discussed above, means the entity's
primary or predominant activity. Interpreting "involves" to mean merely having as
a part thereof (however minor) or having some tangential relationship to would be
inconsistent with the statute's focus on an entity's "principal" business activity.

Our interpretation is also consistent with the broader statutory scheme. The
relevant statutory provisions are plainly designed to provide a tax credit for certain
employees and employers in the aviation sector. This is reflected in the bill's title
("providing tax credits for graduates of aerospace and aviation-related educational
programs and employers of program graduates"12), which is appropriate to consider
when construing the statute in pari materia.13 Given this broader context, we
believe K.S.A. 79-32,290(g)'s use of the word "involves" means that an entity's
principal business activity must be closely related to the aviation sector.

Indeed, any other interpretation would lead to absurd results. The definition of
"qualified employer" is the only statutory provision that specifically ties the tax
credits to the aviation sector.14 And so if WSU is a "qualified employer," the
Aviation/Aerospace Tax Credit would be available to a broad range of WSU
employees, even those with no connection to the aviation sector, for instance,
employees of WSU's music department. Similarly, as KDOR notes, if "involves"

10 Involve, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed. 2009).
11 See generally State v. Strong, 317 Kan. 197, 203, 527 P.3d 548 (2023) (stating that, in interpreting
statutory language, one must look to "the specific context in which that language is used, and the
broader context of the statute as a whole" (quotation omitted)).
12 2022 H.B. 2239.
13 Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc., 227 Kan. 842, 846, 610 P.2d 1107 (1980) ("Though the heading

or title given an act of the legislature forms no part of the statute itself, the language of the title
cannot be ignored as an aid in determining legislative intent." (internal citation omitted)); Antonin
Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 221-24 (2012)
(explaining that a statute's title is a permissible indicator of the statute's meaning). Consideration of
the title is particularly appropriate when dealing with our state's statutes, given the Kansas
Constitution's requirement that "[t]he subject of each bill shall be expressed in its title," Kan. Const.
art. II, § 16.
14 "Qualified employee[s]" must also have graduated from a "qualified program," but the definition of

"qualified program" is broadly defined to include, among other things, a program accredited by "a
regional accrediting body and that awards an undergraduate or graduate degree" as well as associate
of applied science degree programs and career technical education programs. See K.S.A. 79-
32,290(h). There is nothing in that definition tying it to aerospace.

refers to any business activity tangentially related to the aviation sector, then
employees of an all-purpose hardware store that occasionally supplies goods to the
aviation sector could qualify for the tax credit. That would be inconsistent with the
purpose of the statute.

Based on the facts you have provided, WSU's principal business activity is not
closely related to the aviation sector. While WSU does offer aviation-related
programs, those programs do not predominate over its other educational activities.
We therefore conclude that WSU is not a "qualified employer" for purposes of K.S.A.
79-32,290(g).

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/ Kris W. Kobach

                                   Kris W. Kobach
                                   Attorney General

                                   /s/ Dwight R. Carswell

                                   Dwight R. Carswell
                                   Deputy Solicitor General