FL AGO 2009-27 June 15, 2009

Can a Florida port district give a grant to build replica boats that will be donated to a museum in Spain?

Short answer: Attorney General Bill McCollum concluded he could not find that a district purpose would be served by the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District funding a grant to build two replica boats that would be donated to a museum in Spain. A port district's powers, whether from its special act charter or Chapter 315, must be exercised to improve and maintain the waterways within the district, and the AG found it hard to see how a project ending up in Spain advertised the port. The opinion noted that whether a particular expenditure serves a district purpose is ultimately for the district board to decide, not the AG.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2009. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Florida law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2009
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The attorney for the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District asked whether the district could grant money to the Junior Service League of St. Augustine to build two replica boats. The boats, modeled on vessels the Spanish settlers might have used, would be donated to a museum in Spain, which would in turn donate a boat back to the St. Augustine Lighthouse and Museum for display. The district's own attorney thought this was outside the district's authority, but a counsel for a maritime program argued the grant could count as "advertising" for the district.

Attorney General Bill McCollum could not conclude that a district purpose would be served. The district is an independent special district created in 1937, governed by its special act charter (codified in Chapter 2000-478, Laws of Florida) and by Chapter 315, the 1959 Port Facilities Financing Law. Both grant broad powers, including authority to advertise and promote the port (section 315.031 and the charter's advertising clause). But the opinion stressed the settled rule that special districts have only the powers expressly granted or necessarily implied, and any reasonable doubt about a power is resolved against its exercise. Those powers, however broad, must serve the district's core job of improving and maintaining the waterways within the district. The AG pointed to two recent opinions applying the same logic: a water control district could not buy a golf course complex (AGO 2009-13), and a county water authority could not fund a fishing tournament or soccer league (AGO 2007-24). Against that backdrop, the AG said it was difficult to see how a grant for a project ending up in Spain would advertise the St. Augustine port. The opinion was careful to add that the ultimate call on whether an expenditure satisfies a district purpose belongs to the district board, not the Attorney General.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2009. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: What can a Florida special district spend its money on?
A: The opinion restated the general rule: a special district has only the powers expressly granted by law or those necessarily implied to carry out the express powers, and reasonable doubt about a power is resolved against it. Spending must serve the district's statutory purpose, here improving and maintaining the district's waterways.

Q: Doesn't a port district's advertising power cover this?
A: The district did have broad advertising authority under its charter and section 315.031. The AG just could not see how a grant for boats donated to a museum in Spain would advertise the St. Augustine port, so it was hard to fit the expenditure within that power.

Q: Did the Attorney General flatly forbid the grant?
A: No. The opinion said it could not conclude a district purpose would be served, but it also stated that the ultimate determination of whether an expenditure satisfies a district purpose is for the district board to make, not the AG.

Background and statutory framework

The St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District was created as an independent special district in 1937. Chapter 2000-478, Laws of Florida, gathered the special acts about the district into one charter, and the district is also subject to Chapter 315, the 1959 Port Facilities Financing Law. The charter gives the commission wide authority to acquire property, build and operate harbor improvements, set port charges, exercise eminent domain, and advertise the port. Section 315.031 separately authorizes port units to publicize and promote their port facilities, though it bars spending on meals, hospitality, amusement, or entertainment. Section 315.02(4) defines which entities count as a port "unit," section 315.03 lists the general powers, and section 315.05(1) authorizes bonds for port facilities.

The limiting principle is that all of these powers, charter and statutory alike, must be exercised to accomplish the district's legislative mandate of improving and maintaining its waterways. The opinion cited the long-standing rule from Forbes Pioneer Boat Line and later cases that a special district's powers are construed narrowly, and applied recent opinions (AGO 2009-13 and AGO 2007-24) holding that district funds cannot stray into projects unconnected to the district's water-related mission.

Citations and references

Statutes:

  • Chapter 315, Florida Statutes (1959 Port Facilities Financing Law)
  • Section 315.031, Florida Statutes (promotion and advertisement of port facilities)
  • Section 315.02(4), Florida Statutes (definition of unit)
  • Section 315.03, Florida Statutes (powers of port units)
  • Section 315.05(1), Florida Statutes (issuance of bonds)
  • Chapter 2000-478, Laws of Florida (special act charter of the district)

Cases:

  • Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, 82 So. 346 (Fla. 1919)
  • State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  • City of Cape Coral v. GAC Utilities, Inc., of Florida, 281 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1973)

Source

Original opinion text

Mr. Geoffrey B. Dobson

Attorney, St. Augustine Port,

Waterway and Beach District

Post Office Box 3588

St. Augustine, Florida 32085

RE: SPECIAL DISTRICTS – PORTS – ADVERTISING – authority for port district to fund grant to build replica boats. Ch. 315, Fla. Stat.; and Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla.

Dear Mr. Dobson:

As attorney for the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District, you have asked for my opinion on substantially the following question:

Is the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District authorized to provide a grant to the Junior Service League of St. Augustine, Inc., for purposes of constructing two replica boats which would be donated to a museum in Spain?

In sum:

In light of the requirement that the powers of the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District must be exercised to improve and maintain waterways within the district, this office cannot conclude that a district purpose would be served by funding a grant to a local service organization for purposes of constructing two replica boats which would be donated to a museum in Spain.

According to your letter, the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District (the district) has received a request for a grant from the Junior Service League of St. Augustine, Inc., a non-profit corporation which, among other things, sponsors and operates the St. Augustine Lighthouse and Museum. The museum has requested this grant for the purpose of constructing two replica boats similar to those that might have been used by the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine. Following construction, the two boats will be donated by the St. Augustine museum to a similar museum in Spain which would, in turn, donate a boat to the St. Augustine museum for display. You have apparently advised your client of your opinion that this expenditure is not within the scope of the district's authority and have also included with your correspondence a copy of an opinion from counsel to the Lighthouse Archaeology Maritime Program suggesting that such an expenditure may be authorized as "advertising" for the district.

The St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District was created as an independent special district in 1937.[1] Chapter 2000-478, Laws of Florida, codifies all the special acts relating to the district into a single, comprehensive special act charter for the district.[2] In addition to the provisions of the special act, the district is subject to the provisions of Chapter 315, Florida Statutes, the "1959 Port Facilities Financing Law."[3]

The governing authority of the district is the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach Commission, composed of five elected commission members.[4] The commission is designated a corporate body and authorized to contract and be contracted with and to sue and be sued.[5] Among the specific powers provided to the district in its charter are the following:

"(a) To acquire . . . all property real or personal or any estate or interest therein, within or without the district which . . . the commission shall determine to be necessary for the purposes of the district . . . to improve, maintain, sell, lease, convey, exchange, or otherwise dispose of the same. . . .

(b) To . . . construct, condemn, purchase, own, acquire, add to, maintain, . . . operate, build, equip, manage, . . . control, repair, and establish jetties, piers, quays, wharves, docks, warehouses, storehouses, breakwaters, bulkheads, public landings, slips, seawalls, turning basins, harbors, ports waterways, channels, moles, dry docks, terminal facilities, canals . . . airways, landing fields, conveyors, modern appliances for economical handling of storage and transportation of freight and the handling of passenger traffic, and all other harbor improvements and facilities which . . . the commission may determine to be necessary, and in connection with the operation or improvement of the district, to perform all customary services . . . received or shipped through said harbor.

(c) To improve all navigable and nonnavigable waters situated within the district, to create and improve for harbor purposes any waterways within the district, to regulate and control all such waters and all natural or artificial waterways within the limits of the district, subject to regulatory authority given to other governmental authorities pursuant to general or special law. . . .

(d) To fix . . . the rates of wharfage, dockage, warehousing, storage, and port and terminal charges . . . and to fix and determine the rates, tolls, and other charges for the use of harbor improvements and harbor facilities. . . .

(e) To exercise such police powers as . . . the commission shall determine to be necessary for the effective and complete control, regulation, and protection of the district, and all harbor improvements and facilities. . . .

    • *

(j) To exercise the right of eminent domain and to condemn, appropriate, and acquire any property, both real and personal . . . which . . . the commission shall determine to be necessary. . . .

(l) To advertise Port St. Augustine in such manner as the commission deems advisable, to negotiate and contract with shipping companies, and such other institutions, associations, and companies as the commission may deem necessary for the purpose of advancing and promoting Port St. Augustine." [6]

The commission has the power to levy ad valorem taxes upon all taxable property within the district which must be used "for the purposes authorized and prescribed by this act, subject to the limitations and restrictions herein provided" at a maximum millage rate of 3 mills.[7] The commission is also authorized to issue bonds for the purpose of paying all or a part of the cost of port facilities.[8]

The grant of powers to port districts under Chapter 315, Florida Statutes, appears to be substantially similar, and potentially more extensive, than those provided in the special act.[9] Section 315.031, Florida Statutes, provides for the promotion and advertisement of port facilities and states that

"[e]ach unit[10] is authorized and empowered:

(a) To publicize, advertise and promote the activities and port facilities herein authorized;

(b) To make known the advantages, facilities, resources, products, attractions and attributes of the activities and port facilities herein authorized;

(c) To create a favorable climate of opinion concerning the activities and port facilities herein authorized;

(d) To cooperate with other agencies, public and private, in accomplishing these purposes;

(e) To enter into agreements with the purchaser or purchasers of port facilities bonds issued under the provisions of this law to establish a special fund to be set aside from the proceeds of the revenues collected under the provisions of s. 315.03(14), during any fiscal year, for the promotional activities authorized herein.

Nothing herein shall be construed to authorize any unit to expend funds for meals, hospitality, amusement or any other purpose of an entertainment nature.

(2) All obligations, expenses and costs incurred under the provisions of this section shall be paid from such fund when vouchers thereof, approved by the governing body of the unit, are exhibited to the responsible authority making disbursements for the governing body."

Research reveals that the terms of this statute have not been litigated and no staff analysis or other illustrative legislative history is available relating to the enactment and legislative purpose of 315.031, Florida Statutes (1967).

As is the case with the charter provisions, the general statutory provisions set forth above must be exercised in such a manner as to accomplish the duties and responsibilities imposed on the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District by the Legislature relating to the improvement and maintenance of the waterways within the district. The powers of the district commissioners must be exercised within the scope of this legislative directive as is reflected by the legislative qualification that any such exercise must be "determine[d] to be necessary for the purposes of the district."[11]

It is a well established rule that special districts have only such powers as are expressly granted to them by law or those necessarily implied because they are essential to carry into effect those powers expressly granted; any reasonable doubt as to the lawful existence of a particular power sought to be exercised must be resolved against the exercise thereof.[12] While it is clear from a reading of the enabling legislation for the district and the Port Facilities Financing Law that the powers granted to it are broad, those powers are limited to projects that will advance the purposes of the district.[13]

Relying on this same reasoning, this office recently issued Attorney General Opinion 2009-13 to a water control district. This special district was authorized by its charter and by general statutory provisions to purchase real or personal property for district purposes and to own, acquire, operate, and maintain parks and recreational facilities. The opinion noted that the authority of water control districts is limited to accomplishing water control district purposes and concluded that the purchase of a multi-use golf course facility located within the district that included a driving range, restaurant, bar, sewer plant, and related businesses would be beyond the scope of this authority.

In Attorney General Opinion 2007-24, this office recognized the authority of a county water authority to foster and improve tourist business in the county but noted that the exercise of this authority had to be accomplished through improvements to streams, lakes, and canals in the county. Thus, the expenditure of authority funds to host a fishing tournament or to sponsor a soccer league did not appear to be related to the authority's duties and this office concluded that it was not authorized by the enabling legislation of the district.

While the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District has been granted broad discretion in advertising the port, it is difficult for this office to conceive how providing a grant for a project, the results of which will ultimately be located in Spain, would constitute advertising for the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District. However, the ultimate determination of whether any expenditure satisfies a district purpose is not one that this office is authorized to make; the board is charged with making this determination.

In sum, it is my opinion that, in light of the requirement that the powers of the St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District must be exercised to improve and maintain waterways within the district, this office cannot conclude that a district purpose would be served by funding a grant to a local service organization for purposes of constructing two replica boats which would be donated to a museum in Spain.

Sincerely,

Bill McCollum

Attorney General

BM/tgh


[1] See s. 2, Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla., and Official List of Special Districts Online, St. Augustine Port, Waterway and Beach District, www.floridaspecialdistricts.org.

[2] Section 1, Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla.

[3] See s. 315.01, Fla. Stat., for the short title for Chapter 315, Fla. Stat., and the Official List of Special District Online Information, supra n.1.

[4] Sections 3 and 5, Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla.

[5] Id.

[6] Section 4(a), Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla.

[7] Section 8, Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla.

[8] Section 315.05(1), Fla. Stat.

[9] See s. 315.03, Fla. Stat.

[10] A "unit" is defined in s. 315.02(4), Fla. Stat., to mean "any county, port district, port authority, or municipality or any governmental unit created pursuant to s. 163.01(7)(d) that includes at least one deepwater port as listed in s. 403.021(9)(b)."

[11] See, e.g., s. 4(a), (b), (e), Ch. 2000-478, Laws of Fla., and s. 315.03(10) and (15), Fla. Stat.

[12] See, e.g., Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, 82 So. 346 (Fla. 1919); Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 89-34 (1989); State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So. 2d 628 (Fla 1st DCA 1974), cert. dismissed, 300 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 1974); City of Cape Coral v. GAC Utilities, Inc., of Florida, 281 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1973).

[13] See e.g., Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 2009-13 (water control district not authorized to purchase multi-use golf course facility located within district that includes a driving range, restaurant, bar, sewer plant, and related businesses); 2007-24 (use of water authority's funds to host a fishing tournament or sponsor a soccer league would not appear to be related to authority's duties to foster and improve tourism through improvement of streams, lakes, canals); 86-90 (1986).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2009 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.