What did Florida certify about its parental-rights law for a 2018 Rape Survivor Child Custody Act grant application?

Short answer The AG's office identified section 39.806(1)(m) as Florida's qualifying statute and certified that it remained in force and had not changed since its 2013 enactment. The letter supported a federal grant application; it did not announce a federal funding decision.
State
Florida
Opinion
INFORMAL
Issued
February 23, 2018
Issued by
Florida Attorney General
Requested by
Katharine Sullivan, Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2018. Ask about yours and see what current Florida law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is a Florida Attorney General certification letter. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

This document is not a typical legal opinion answering a question of law. It is a certification letter from the Florida AG's office to the U.S. Department of Justice's Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), submitted as part of the Florida Department of Health's application for federal grant funding under the Rape Survivor Child Custody Act (RSCCA).

Federal law lets OVW supplement a state's Sexual Assault Services Formula Grant Program (SASP) and STOP Program funding when the state has a qualifying law allowing termination of a rapist's parental rights for a child conceived through rape. The AG certified two facts: that Florida's qualifying statute, § 39.806(1)(m), had not changed since the state received fiscal-year 2017 RSCCA funds, and that the statute remained in full force.

The letter recapped the substance of § 39.806(1)(m), which the Florida Legislature enacted in 2013 (Ch. 2013-132). The statute allows a court to terminate parental rights on clear and convincing evidence that the child was conceived as a result of sexual battery (defined in § 794.011) or under a similar law of another state, territory, possession, or Native American tribe. The statute also presumes termination is in the child's best interest if the child was so conceived, allows a petition to be filed at any time, and applies retroactively to all unlawful sexual battery acts (whether before, on, or after July 1, 2013).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2018. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: What is the federal Rape Survivor Child Custody Act?
A: It is a federal program that authorizes the U.S. Department of Justice's Office on Violence Against Women to supplement state grant funding (SASP and STOP) in states that have qualifying laws allowing termination of a rapist's parental rights when a child was conceived through rape.

Q: What was Florida's qualifying statute?
A: Section 39.806(1)(m), enacted in 2013. The statute lists conception by sexual battery (as defined in § 794.011) as a ground for terminating parental rights upon clear and convincing evidence.

Q: What proof did the letter say the statute required?
A: The letter said a court may terminate parental rights upon finding clear and convincing evidence that the child was conceived as a result of sexual battery under section 794.011, or under a similar law of the listed jurisdictions where the offense occurred. It did not discuss whether a criminal conviction is required.

Q: Did the statute apply to acts of sexual battery committed before its 2013 effective date?
A: Yes. The letter cites Ch. 2013-132 for the provision applying retroactively to "all unlawful acts of sexual battery occurring before, on, or after [July 1, 2013]."

Q: Was termination presumed to be in the child's best interest?
A: The letter said the statute presumes termination is in the child's best interest if the child was conceived as a result of unlawful sexual battery. It did not explain how a court applies that presumption in a proceeding.

Background and statutory framework

The letter identifies section 39.806(1)(m), Florida Statutes, enacted in 2013, as Florida's qualifying provision for terminating parental rights when a child is conceived through rape. It cites section 3 of Ch. 2013-132, Laws of Florida, for the provision's retroactive reach.

The letter says the federal Rape Survivor Child Custody Act authorizes the Office on Violence Against Women to supplement SASP and STOP funding in states with qualifying laws. Florida's Department of Health sought the funds, and the AG's office was asked to certify that Florida's statute had not changed since the state received supplemental funding in fiscal year 2017.

Citations and references

Statutes:

Source

Original opinion text

Ms. Katharine Sullivan

Principal Deputy Director

Office on Violence Against Women

U.S. Department of Justice

145 N Street, NE, Suite 10W.121

Washington, DC 20530

Dear Director Sullivan:

This letter is written in conjunction with the Florida Department of Health's application to receive a federal grant from the Department of Justice providing supplemental funding for sexual violence recovery programs in this state.

The Florida Department of Health's Violence and Injury Prevention Program administers federal funds awarded by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for several programs, including the Sexual Assault Services Formula Grant Program (SASP) and the Services-Training-Officers-Prosecutors (STOP) program. The federal Rape Survivor Child Custody Act (RSCCA) authorizes the Office on Violence Against Women to supplement SASP and STOP program funding in states which have qualifying laws regarding termination of parental rights of rapists for children conceived through rape.[1] In connection with the Florida Department of Health's application to receive such funds, this office has been asked to certify that the state's qualifying statute has not been amended since Florida received federal funds to supplement funding for these programs in fiscal year 2017.

Section 39.806(1)(m), Florida Statutes, enacted in 2013, is Florida's qualifying statute regarding the termination of a rapist's parental rights when a child is conceived through rape. As a Senior Assistant Attorney General representing the Florida Department of Legal Affairs, I certify both that the statute's provisions have not been changed since enactment of section 39.806(1)(m), Florida Statutes, and that such provisions remain in full force and effect. In pertinent part, the statute continues to provide that:

  • parental rights may be terminated upon the court's determination that clear and convincing evidence exists that the child was conceived as a result of a sexual battery as defined in section 794.011, Florida Statutes, or pursuant to a similar law of another state, territory, possession, or Native American tribe where the offense occurred;

  • it is presumed that termination of parental rights is in the best interest of the child if the child was conceived as a result of the unlawful sexual battery;

  • a petition for termination of parental rights under section 39.806(1)(m), Florida Statutes, may be filed at any time; and

  • the provisions of the statute apply retroactively to "all unlawful acts of sexual battery occurring before, on, or after [July 1, 2013]."[2]

Sincerely,

Teresa L. Mussetto

Senior Assistant Attorney General

Opinions Division

Florida Department of Legal Affairs

TLM/tsh

cc: Ms. Celeste Philip, MD, MPH

_______________

[1] See Op. Letter to Ms. Nadine M. Neufville, Acting Director, February 28, 2017; Op. Letter to Ms. Bea Hanson, Deputy Director, May 4, 2016.

[2] See § 3, Ch. 2013-132, Laws of Fla.

What does Florida law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2018. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace