FL AGO 2010-38 September 16, 2010

Can a Florida public agency cut its terminal sick-leave payout cap below the 480 hours state law requires?

Short answer: No. The AG concluded that section 110.122(3), Florida Statutes, mandated terminal pay for unused sick leave (one-fourth of hours accrued after October 1, 1973, capped at 480 hours) for state employees with at least 10 years of service. An employing agency such as a public defender's office could not adopt a policy lowering that cap, even to cope with budget shortfalls.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Florida law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Facing budget pressure, the Public Defender for Florida's Twentieth Judicial Circuit asked whether her office could lower the maximum sick-leave payout it gave employees when they left, below the 480-hour ceiling set in state law. Attorney General Bill McCollum said no.

Section 110.122, Florida Statutes, required state agencies to pay "terminal incentive pay" for accumulated, unused sick leave to employees who retired or left after at least 10 years of creditable state service. Subsection (3) fixed the formula: one-eighth of sick leave accrued before October 1, 1973, plus one-fourth of sick leave accrued on or after that date, with the post-1973 portion capped at 480 hours of actual payment. The AG read this as a legislative mandate, not a floor an agency could adjust downward. Because the statute told agencies how the payout "shall" be calculated, an agency could not set a lower cap.

Because the answer to the first question was no, the AG did not reach the office's follow-up question about whether a reduction would apply to employees hired before the change.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2010. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: What did the 480-hour cap mean in practice?
A: It set the maximum number of unused sick-leave hours an agency would actually pay out at termination for leave accrued on or after October 1, 1973. The opinion read the figure as a statutory mandate the agency had to honor, not a number it could lower.

Q: Could the agency lower the payout to save money?
A: No. The AG concluded that nothing in section 110.122 let an employing agency reduce or limit the legislatively mandated payment for employees who had met the 10-year service requirement. Budget constraints did not change that.

Q: Who qualified for terminal sick-leave pay under the statute?
A: Employees who retired, otherwise left, or died after 10 years of creditable state employment, per section 110.122(1). The pay went to the employee or, on death, to the beneficiary.

Q: Did agencies have any discretion over sick leave at all?
A: Some. Under Department of Management Services rules (Rule 60L-34.0042), agencies could address matters like sick-leave pools and transfer policies. What they could not do was set a terminal-pay cap below the statutory formula.

Background and statutory framework

Chapter 110, Florida Statutes, sets up Florida's state personnel system. Section 110.122 requires agencies with authority over their own personnel policies to provide terminal "incentive" pay for accumulated, unused sick leave once an employee reaches 10 years of creditable service. The Department of Management Services adopts the implementing rules.

The dispute turned on the word "shall" in subsection (3), which directs that rules and policies "shall permit terminal pay for sick leave" under the stated formula, capped at 480 hours. The AG relied on the settled canon that "shall" signals a mandatory requirement (Drury v. Harding; Holloway v. State; Neal v. Bryant) and on the related rule that a legislative direction about how something must be done forbids doing it another way (Alsop v. Pierce; Thayer v. State). Together, those canons meant an agency policy capping the payout below the statutory figure would conflict with the statute and could not stand.

Citations and references

Statutes and rules:

  • § 110.122, Fla. Stat. (terminal incentive pay for unused sick leave; 480-hour cap)
  • § 110.105, Fla. Stat. (purpose of the state personnel system)
  • § 110.107(1), Fla. Stat. (defines "Department" as the Department of Management Services)
  • Rule 60L-34.0042, Fla. Admin. Code

Cases (cited for statutory-construction canons):

  • Drury v. Harding, 461 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1984); Holloway v. State, 342 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1977); Neal v. Bryant, 149 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1962), "shall" is mandatory
  • Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 1944); Thayer v. State, 335 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 1976), a prescribed method forbids other methods

Source

Original opinion text

The Honorable Kathleen A. Smith

Law Offices of the Public Defender

Twentieth Judicial Circuit

Post Office Drawer 1980

Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1980

RE: RETIREMENT – DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES – PUBLIC DEFENDER – whether agency can reduce number of hours accumulated for terminal sick leave payment. s. 110.122, Fla. Stat.

Dear Ms. Smith:

As Public Defender for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit of Florida, you have requested my opinion on substantially the following questions:

  1. Whether the Public Defender may reduce the maximum payout of 480 hours in its policy for sick leave payout upon termination, notwithstanding the provisions of section 110.122, Florida Statutes.

  2. If the answer to Question One is in the affirmative, will such a change include employees hired prior to the implementation of such change?

In sum:

  1. Section 110.122(3), Florida Statutes, requires employing agencies within the scope of that chapter to permit terminal pay for sick leave equal to one-fourth of all unused sick leave accumulated after October 1, 1973, to a maximum of 480 hours of actual payment. Nothing in this statute authorizes employing entities to reduce or limit this legislatively mandated payment for those employees who have met the 10-year service requirement of section 110.122(1), Florida Statutes.

  2. In light of the response to Question One, no discussion of your second question is necessary.

In light of current budgetary constraints, you ask whether your office may limit or reduce the amount of terminal incentive pay for accumulated and unused sick leave from the prescribed limits contained in section 110.122(3), Florida Statutes.

Chapter 110, Florida Statutes, provides the employment policy of the state. The Legislature has declared that:

"It is the purpose of this chapter to establish a system of personnel management. This system shall provide means to recruit, select, train, develop, and maintain an effective and responsible workforce and shall include policies and procedures for employee hiring and advancement, training and career development, position classification, salary administration, benefits, discipline, discharge, employee performance evaluations, affirmative action, and other related activities."[1]

The statement of legislative intent also provides that "[t]his chapter contains requirements and guides for establishing and maintaining a system of personnel administration on a merit basis."[2]

Pursuant to section 110.122(1), Florida Statutes:

"All state branches, departments, and agencies which have the authority to establish or approve personnel policies for employees and to employ personnel and establish the conditions of their employment shall establish policies to provide terminal 'incentive' pay for accumulated and unused sick leave to each employee upon normal or regular retirement for reason other than disability or upon termination of employment, or to the employee’s beneficiary if service is terminated by death, provided such retirement, termination, or death occurs after 10 years of creditable state employment."

Thus, the Legislature has mandated that employing agencies "establish policies to provide terminal 'incentive' pay for accumulated and unused sick leave to each employee upon normal or regular retirement[.]" The statute requires the employing entity to adopt and publish rules governing "the accumulation and use of sick leave and maintain accurate and reliable records showing the amount of sick leave which has accumulated and is unused by the employee" at his or her retirement.[3]

The parameters of those policies for terminal incentive pay for accumulated and unused sick leave are established in subsection (3):

"The payments authorized by this section shall be determined by using the rate of pay received by the employee at the time of retirement, termination, or death, applied to the sick leave time for which the employee is qualified to receive terminal "incentive" pay under the rules adopted by the department pursuant to the provisions of this section. Rules and policies adopted pursuant to this section shall permit terminal pay for sick leave equal to one-eighth of all unused sick leave credit accumulated prior to October 1, 1973, plus one-fourth of all unused sick leave accumulated on or after October 1, 1973. However, terminal pay allowable for unused sick leave accumulated on or after October 1, 1973, shall not exceed a maximum of 480 hours of actual payment. Employees shall be required to use all sick leave accumulated prior to October 1, 1973, before using sick leave accumulated on or after October 1, 1973."[ 4] (e.s.)

The statute recognizes that "the department," that is, the Department of Management Services,[5] is to adopt administrative rules for implementing this section.[6] Thus, pursuant to Department of Management Services rules, agencies may adopt rules addressing such matters as sick leave pools and sick leave transfer policies.[7] However, section 110.122(3), Florida Statutes, specifically requires that rules and policies adopted pursuant to this section must permit terminal pay for sick leave equal to one-fourth of all unused sick leave accumulated after October 1, 1973, to a maximum of four hundred eighty hours of actual payment. Nothing in section 110.122, Florida Statutes, authorizes an employing entity to adopt policies which would limit or reduce the maximum number of hours for calculation of terminal pay for sick leave; rather, the mandatory language of this section would appear to preclude any conflicting rules or policies.[8]

Therefore, it is my opinion that section 110.122(3), Florida Statutes, requires employing agencies within the scope of that chapter to permit terminal pay for sick leave equal to one-fourth of all unused sick leave accumulated after October 1, 1973, to a maximum of 480 hours of actual payment. Nothing in this statute authorizes employing entities to reduce or limit this legislatively mandated payment for those employees who have met the 10-year service requirement of section 110.122(1), Florida Statutes.

Sincerely,

Bill McCollum

Attorney General

BM/tgh


[1] Section 110.105(1), Fla. Stat.

[2] Section 110.105(4), Fla. Stat.

[3] Section 110.122(2), Fla. Stat.

[4] The word "shall" is normally used in a statute to connote a mandatory requirement. Drury v. Harding, 461 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1984); Holloway v. State, 342 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1977); and Neal v. Bryant, 149 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1962).

[5] See s. 110.107(1), Fla. Stat., providing that "'Department' means the Department of Management Services."

[6] See Rule 60L-34.0042, Fla. Admin. Code.

[7] See Rule 60L-34.0042(5) and (6), Fla. Admin. Code.

[8] It is the rule that a legislative direction as to how a thing shall be done is, in effect, a prohibition against its being done in any other way. Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So. 2d 799, 805-806 (Fla. 1944); Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel, 56 So. 2d 341, 342 (Fla. 1952); Thayer v. State, 335 So. 2d 815, 817 (Fla. 1976).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2010 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.