FL AGO 2013-09 June 5, 2013

Does Florida's 20-week cap on government severance pay apply to a county port authority?

Short answer: Yes. The AG concluded that the Seminole County Port Authority, a dependent special district, is a 'unit of government' under section 215.425, so employment contracts it signed after July 1, 2011 are subject to the law's limits on severance pay (no more than 20 weeks of compensation, and none for an employee fired for misconduct).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Florida law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Seminole County Port Authority, a dependent special district created by the Legislature to operate the Port of Sanford, asked whether it counts as a "unit of government" under section 215.425, Florida Statutes. That statute, for contracts entered after July 1, 2011, limits the severance pay a government may agree to: no more than 20 weeks of compensation, and none at all when the person is fired for misconduct.

Attorney General Pam Bondi answered that the port authority is a unit of government for this purpose, so its post-July-1-2011 employment contracts are subject to those severance-pay restrictions. The statute uses "unit of government" without any limiting language, and the AG declined to read in a limitation the Legislature did not write. As a body politic and corporate and a dependent special district (a "local unit of special purpose government"), the authority fell within the broad term.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2013. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: What does section 215.425 limit?
A: For contracts or employment agreements entered, renewed, or renegotiated after July 1, 2011, it caps severance pay at 20 weeks of compensation and bars any severance when the officer, agent, employee, or contractor is fired for misconduct as defined in section 443.036(30).

Q: Why did the AG treat the port authority as a "unit of government"?
A: The statute uses the phrase without qualification. The opinion applied the rule that clear statutory language should not be narrowed by reading in limitations, and noted the authority is a body politic and corporate and a dependent special district, a local unit of government.

Q: Did the opinion rule on the authority's actual contract?
A: No. The AG noted the authority had entered an agreement providing six months' severance for its administrator, but the office said it would not comment on any particular contract; it addressed only whether the statute applied to a body like the authority.

Q: Does this reach independent districts too, or only dependent ones?
A: The opinion's reasoning turned on the breadth of "unit of government," which it read to cover local units generally. It resolved the question for the dependent Seminole County Port Authority and cited prior opinions treating other local districts, dependent and independent, as units of government.

Background and statutory framework

Section 215.425, Florida Statutes, governs extra compensation and severance pay across Florida government. The 2011 amendments added subsection (4)(a), capping severance at 20 weeks and prohibiting it for misconduct firings, and subsection (5), barring confidentiality clauses that would block discussion of such agreements.

The phrase "unit of government" is not defined in section 215.425. The AG read it broadly, pointing to section 1.01(8) (which lists counties, cities, special districts, and "all other districts" within "body politic" and "political subdivision") and section 189.403 (defining "special district" and "dependent special district"). Because the Seminole County Port Authority was created by Chapter 2010-240, Laws of Florida, as a body politic and corporate and a dependent special district, the opinion concluded it is a unit of government subject to the severance-pay limits. The opinion also noted the authority's own counsel had reached the same conclusion.

Citations and references

Statutes:

Cases:

  • Department of Revenue ex rel. Smith v. Selles, 47 So. 3d 916 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), unambiguous statutory language may not be extended, modified, or limited by construction
  • Hott Interiors, Inc. v. Fostock, 721 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), courts may not go beyond the clear wording and plain meaning of an unambiguous statute

Source

Original opinion text

Mr. Damon Chase, Chairman
Seminole County Port Authority
1510 Kastner Place, Suite 1
Sanford, Florida 32771

RE: PORT AUTHORITIES – PORTS – BONUSES – SEVERANCE PAY – EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS – whether port authority is a "unit of government" for purposes of s. 215.425, Fla. Stat., for employee severance pay. s. 215.425, Fla Stat.; Ch. 2010-240, Laws of Fla.

Dear Mr. Chase:

On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Seminole County Port Authority, you have asked for my opinion on substantially the following question:

Is the Seminole County Port Authority, a dependent special district, a "unit of government" for purposes of section 215.425, Florida Statutes, which limits the amount of severance pay that can be authorized under an employment contract?

In sum:

The Seminole County Port Authority, a dependent special district, is a "unit of government" for purposes of section 215.425, Florida Statutes, and employment contracts entered into by the authority after July 1, 2011, would be subject to the restrictions on severance pay contained therein.

The Seminole County Port Authority (the authority) is a dependent special district, a "body politic and corporate," created to operate the Port of Sanford.[1] The port authority is empowered to "serve as a local governmental body within the meaning of Section 10(c) of Article VII of the State Constitution or as a local agency under part II of chapter 159, Florida Statutes[.]"[2]

Information supplied with your request indicates that after July 1, 2011, the authority entered into an employment agreement with its administrator which provided for six months severance pay. While this office will not comment on any particular contract to which the authority is a party, I understand your question to be whether a unit of local government such as the port authority may be a "unit of government" within the scope of section 215.425(4)(a), Florida Statutes, which limits the severance payments that can be authorized under an employment contract.

Your question specifically references section 215.425(4)(a), Florida Statutes, which requires that, after July 1, 2011:

"[A] unit of government that enters into a contract or employment agreement, or renewal or renegotiation of an existing contract or employment agreement, that contains a provision for severance pay with an officer, agent, employee, or contractor must include the following provisions in the contract:

  1. A requirement that severance pay provided may not exceed an amount greater than 20 weeks of compensation.

  2. A prohibition of provision of severance pay when the officer, agent, employee, or contractor has been fired for misconduct, as defined in s. 443.036(30), by the unit of government."[3]

The phrase "unit of government" as it is used in section 215.425, Florida Statutes, is not defined.[4] However, the Legislature has not included qualifying or limiting language and, in the absence of any such language, the statute should not be read to include limitations that are not contained therein. Where the plain and ordinary meaning of statutory language is clear, that language should not be construed in a manner that would extend, modify, or limit its express terms or its reasonable and obvious implications.[5]

The Seminole County Port Authority is constituted by the Legislature as a body politic and corporate, created to operate the Port of Sanford. The port authority is a dependent district, defined by statute as a "local unit of special purpose, as opposed to general-purpose, government[.]"[6] Section 215.425, Florida Statutes, applies broadly to "units of government" without limitation. Thus, section 215.425, Florida Statutes, would appear to apply to a local unit of government such as the Seminole County Port Authority.[7]

In sum, it is my opinion that the Seminole County Port Authority, a local unit of government, is a "unit of government" as that phrase is used in section 215.425, Florida Statutes, for the purpose of determining severance payments for its employees. I note that your attorney has reached the same conclusion[8] and this office concurs in his determination.

Sincerely,

Pam Bondi
Attorney General

PB/tgh


[1] Section 1, Ch. 2010-240, Laws of Fla.

[2] Section 3(19), id.

[3] Further, any agreement or contract executed on or after July 1, 2011, which involves extra compensation between a unit of government and an officer, agent, employee, or contractor may not include provisions that limit the ability of any party to the agreement or contract to discuss the agreement or contract pursuant to s. 215.425(5), Fla. Stat.

[4] But see s. 1.01(8), Fla. Stat., stating that "[t]he words 'public body,' 'body politic,' or 'political subdivision' include counties, cities, towns, villages, special tax school districts, special road and bridge districts, bridge districts, and all other districts in this state." (e.s.)

[5] See Department of Revenue ex rel. Smith v. Selles, 47 So. 3d 916 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (where plain and ordinary meaning of statutory language is unambiguous, court cannot construe statute in manner that would extend, modify, or limit its express terms or its reasonable and obvious implications); Hott Interiors, Inc. v. Fostock, 721 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (if statute is not ambiguous, unreasonable, or illogical, the court may not go beyond clear wording and plain meaning to expand its reach; to do so would extend or modify the express terms of the statute, which would be an improper abrogation of legislative power). And compare s. 215.322(5), Fla. Stat., relating to the acceptance of credit cards by state agencies, units of local government, and the judicial branch which states that "[a] unit of local government, including a municipality, special district, or board of county commissioners or other governing body of a county. . . ." may accept payment by credit card for financial obligations owed to that unit of local government.

[6] See s. 189.403(1) and (2), Fla. Stat., defining "[s]pecial district" and "[d]ependent special district."

[7] Cf. s. 119.011(2), Fla. Stat., including "districts" within the definition of the term "[a]gency" along with other separate units of government created or established by law; s. 189.403(1), Fla. Stat., defining a "[s]pecial district" as "a local unit of special purpose, as opposed to general-purpose, government" and (2) defining a "[d]ependent special district" as a special district that meets certain specified criteria; and Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 12-35 (2012) (housing finance authority as local governmental unit) and 07-17 (2007) (water and sewer district, independent special district as a special district and a local unit of special purpose government).

[8] See Memorandum of Law from Stephen H. Coover to Attorney General Pam Bondi, dated March 22, 2013.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.