FL AGO 2010-12 April 22, 2010

Can a Florida clerk of court charge the county a fee to record a judgment for court costs as a lien?

Short answer: No. The AG concluded that section 939.185 directs the clerk to cause a certified copy of a cost judgment to be recorded (creating a lien), but the statute does not make the county responsible for a fee for that certification and recording. Given the unusual way the duty was imposed on the clerk, the clerk must record without collecting a fee from the county, though the AG suggested seeking legislative clarification.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Florida law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Clerk of the Circuit Court for Brevard County asked, on behalf of himself and the county commission, whether the clerk could collect a fee from the county for certifying and recording copies of judgments imposing additional court costs under section 939.185, Florida Statutes. Attorney General Bill McCollum concluded that the clerk could not charge the county for that work.

A 2009 amendment to section 939.185 directs that when a court imposes the additional, locally adopted court costs, "[t]he clerk of court shall cause a certified copy of the court order imposing such costs to be recorded in the public records," and the recorded order then operates as a lien on the defendant's property. The AG read this language as unique: it puts the duty to initiate the recording on the clerk, not on the county, and it does not ask the county to request or file anything. Because the statute is silent on whether a service charge may be collected, and because the Legislature elsewhere has said expressly when a clerk records "upon payment of" a fee, the AG concluded the clerk must carry out this legislatively mandated recording without collecting a fee from the county. Noting that clerks around the state had read the statute inconsistently, the opinion suggested seeking a legislative clarification.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2010. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: What is the section 939.185 cost the opinion is about?
A: It is an additional court cost (up to $65) that a county may adopt by ordinance, imposed when a person pleads or is found guilty of, or is adjudicated delinquent for, a felony, misdemeanor, delinquent act, or criminal traffic offense. The money funds court-system needs, legal aid, law libraries, and juvenile programs.

Q: Why does the judgment get recorded at all?
A: The 2009 amendment made the recorded order a lien against the defendant's property. Once recorded, it attaches as a lien on real property in that county like a judgment under section 55.10, and on personal property statewide once a judgment lien certificate is filed with the Department of State.

Q: Why couldn't the clerk charge the county?
A: The AG read the statute as imposing the recording duty directly on the clerk ("shall cause" the certified copy to be recorded), not on the county. The county is not directed to request or file anything, and the statute is silent on any service charge. The AG contrasted other statutes that expressly let the clerk record "upon payment of" a fee.

Q: Was this a firm rule for every clerk?
A: The opinion stated the clerk must record without collecting a fee from the county, but it also acknowledged that clerks across the state had interpreted the statute inconsistently and that legislative clarification might be advisable.

Background and statutory framework

Section 939.185, Florida Statutes, lets a board of county commissioners adopt an additional court cost and, for certain consolidated or home-rule governments, a surcharge, imposed on conviction or adjudication. A 2009 amendment (Chapter 2009-61, Laws of Florida) added subsection (1)(d), requiring the clerk to cause a certified copy of the cost order to be recorded, with the recorded order operating as a lien on real property under section 55.10 and on personal property upon filing a judgment lien certificate. The statute makes these costs subordinate in priority to other state-imposed costs, victim restitution, and child support.

The opinion reviewed the legislative history (language that originated in House Bill 217 and was added by conference committee to Senate Bill 1718) and found no discussion of charging a fee. It then compared statutes that do expressly condition recording on payment, such as section 497.2765 (recording the purchase of a burial right "upon payment of the service charge") and section 712.06(2) under the Marketable Record Title Act (clerk charges "the same fees for recording" a notice as for deeds), while noting that some filings require no fee at all, such as a state fuel-tax lien under section 206.15. Reading the directive to the clerk as unique, the AG concluded the clerk must record the section 939.185 cost judgment without collecting a fee from the county.

Citations and references

Statutes:

  • § 939.185, Fla. Stat. (additional court costs), including § 939.185(1)(d) (recording; lien) and § 939.185(1)(c) (priority of disbursement)
  • § 55.10, Fla. Stat. (lien of recorded judgment on real property)
  • § 497.2765, Fla. Stat. (recording purchase of a burial right upon payment of a service charge)
  • § 712.06(2), Fla. Stat. (Marketable Record Title Act recording fees)
  • § 206.15, Fla. Stat. (state fuel-tax lien; no filing fee required)

Source

Original opinion text

The Honorable Scott Ellis

Clerk of the Circuit Court

Brevard County

Post Office Box 219

Titusville, Florida 32781-0219

RE: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT – COURT COSTS – COUNTIES – LIENS – OFFICIAL RECORDS – ability of clerk to collect fees from county for recording certified copy of judgment assessing court costs. s. 939.185, Fla. Stat.

Dear Mr. Ellis:

You ask on behalf of yourself and the Brevard County Commission substantially the following question:

May the clerk of the court collect a fee from the Brevard County Commission for certification and recording of copies of judgments containing court costs imposed pursuant to section 939.185, Florida Statutes?

In sum:

Section 939.185(1)(d), Florida Statutes, directs the clerk of the court to record a certified copy of a judgment containing the additional costs authorized in section 939.185, Florida Statutes, but does not make the county responsible for payment of a fee for such certification and recording.

During the 2009 legislative session, section 939.185, Florida Statutes, was amended to provide for the recording of certified copies of judgments ordering additional court costs with the clerk of the courts, such that the judgment becomes a lien upon certain property owned by the person upon whom the costs have been levied.[1] You indicate that there is a disparity in the manner in which clerks have interpreted their ability to collect a fee for the certification and recording of such judgments.

Section 939.185, Florida Statutes, as amended, states:

"(1)(a) The board of county commissioners may adopt by ordinance an additional court cost, not to exceed $65, to be imposed by the court when a person pleads guilty or nolo contendere to, or is found guilty of, or adjudicated delinquent for, any felony, misdemeanor, delinquent act, or criminal traffic offense under the laws of this state. Such additional assessment shall be accounted for separately by the county in which the offense occurred and be used only in the county imposing this cost, to be allocated as follows:

  1. Twenty-five percent of the amount collected shall be allocated to fund innovations to supplement state funding for the elements of the state courts system identified in s. 29.004 and county funding for local requirements under s. 29.008(2)(a)2.

  2. Twenty-five percent of the amount collected shall be allocated to assist counties in providing legal aid programs required under s. 29.008(3)(a).

  3. Twenty-five percent of the amount collected shall be allocated to fund personnel and legal materials for the public as part of a law library.

  4. Twenty-five percent of the amount collected shall be used as determined by the board of county commissioners to support teen court programs, except as provided in s. 938.19(7), juvenile assessment centers, and other juvenile alternative programs.

    • *

(b) In addition to the court costs imposed under paragraph (a) and any other cost, fine, or penalty imposed by law, any unit of local government which is consolidated . . . and any unit of local government operating under a home rule charter . . . may impose by ordinance a surcharge in the amount of $85 to be imposed by the court when a person pleads guilty or nolo contendere to, or is found guilty of, or adjudicated delinquent for, any felony, misdemeanor, delinquent act, or criminal traffic offense under the laws of this state. Revenue from the surcharge shall be transferred to such unit of local government for the purpose of replacing fine revenue deposited into the clerk's fine and forfeiture fund under s. 142.01. Proceeds from the imposition of the surcharge authorized in this paragraph shall not be used for the purpose of securing payment of the principal and interest on bonds."

In subsection (1)(d), the statute provides:

"The clerk of court shall cause a certified copy of the court order imposing such costs to be recorded in the public records. Such record constitutes a lien against the person upon whom the costs are imposed and shall attach as a lien on any real property owned by such person located in the county in which such order is recorded in the same manner and to the same extent as a judgment recorded as provided in s. 55.10. Such order shall attach as a lien on any personal property owned by such person located in the state upon the filing with the Department of State of a judgment lien certificate regarding such order as provided in ss. 55.202-55.209. A lien created under this paragraph does not attach to, or make subject to execution of levy or foreclosure, any real or personal property otherwise exempt under s. 4, Art. X of the State Constitution. A lien created under this paragraph is enforceable in the same manner as provided by law." (e.s.)

It should be noted that the disbursement of the costs imposed pursuant to section 939.185, Florida Statutes, is "subordinate in priority order of disbursement to all other state-imposed costs authorized in this chapter, restitution or other compensation to victims, and child support payments."[2]

The plain language of the statute imposes the duty upon the clerk of the court to "cause" a certified copy of the court order to be recorded in the public records.[3] This language appears to be unique in statutory directives relating to the recording of documents by the clerk of the court. It does not direct the county to request a certified copy, nor does it require the county to file such certified copy in the public records. Rather the clerk is the official who must initiate the filing of a certified copy of the judgment in the public records. Section 939.185, Florida Statutes, is silent as to whether a service charge may be assessed and collected by the clerk of the court for carrying out the legislatively mandated duty.

A review of the legislative history of the act shows that the language regarding recording of a certified copy of the judgment originated in a committee substitute for House Bill 217, a bill relating to court costs. The staff analysis accompanying House Bill 217 states that "[t]his bill also adds that the clerk of the court shall record a certified copy of the court order, which imposes these additional costs, for public record." There is no discussion in the analysis of collecting a fee for the certification and recording. While House Bill 217 did not pass, the exact language was added by the conference committee to Senate Bill 1718 which amended section 939.185, Florida Statutes.[4]

A perusal of various statutes relating to recording documents in the public records and certifying copies by the clerk of the court shows instances where the recording or certification shall be performed by the clerk upon payment of a fee. For example, section 497.2765, Florida Statutes, recognizes the right of a person purchasing a burial right, belowground crypt, grave space, mausoleum, columbarium, ossuary, or scattering garden for the interment, entombment, inurnment, or other disposition of human remains to permanently record the purchase with the clerk of the court in the county where the property is located. The statute states:

"(2) The clerk of the court shall record the evidence of the purchase of a burial right, belowground crypt, grave space, mausoleum, columbarium, ossuary, or scattering garden presented to him or her for recording upon payment of the service charge as otherwise provided by law for the recording of the purchase documents in the official records."[5] (e.s.)

Similarly, when a person seeks to preserve an interest in land which would be affected by the Marketable Record Title Act in Chapter 712, Florida Statutes, that person must file a notice of the claim in writing with the clerk of the circuit court of the county or counties where the land described therein is located. The clerk "shall enter, record, and index said notice in the same manner that deeds are entered, recorded, and indexed, as though the claimant were the grantee in the deed and the purported owner were the grantor in a deed, and the clerk shall charge the same fees for recording thereof as are charged for recording deeds."[6] However, there may be instances where the clerk receives a document for filing and no fee is required.[7]

In light of the discussion above and the apparently unique manner in which the Legislature has imposed the duty upon the clerk of the court, it is my opinion that the clerk of the court must record a certified copy of a judgment containing an assessment of costs authorized in section 939.185, Florida Statutes, without collection of a fee from the county. However, due to the inconsistent interpretation of the statute by various clerks throughout the state, it may be advisable to seek legislative clarification of this issue.

Sincerely,

Bill McCollum

Attorney General

BM/tals


[1] Section 14, Ch. 2009-61, Laws of Fla.

[2] Section 939.185(1)(c), Fla. Stat.

[3] See Webster's Third New International Dictionary (unabridged, 1981), p. 356, defining the transitive verb form of "cause" as "to serve as cause or occasion of; bring into existence."

[4] See Conference Committee Amendment, Florida Senate, CS for SB 1718, May 8, 2009.

[5] Section 497.2765(2), Fla. Stat.

[6] Section 712.06(2), Fla. Stat.

[7] See s. 206.15, Fla. Stat., establishing a lien in favor of the state for delinquent fuel taxes when the state files a claim of lien in the office of the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the principal place of business of the person owing such taxes is located and stating that "no filing fee shall be required."

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2010 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.