FL AGO 2010-42 November 5, 2010

Does Florida require the Child Abuse Death Review Committee to make a full recording of its closed meetings?

Short answer: Yes. Section 383.412 requires that all proceedings of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee, including the closed portions, be recorded so the entire discussion is captured verbatim with nothing off the record. The statute does not specifically demand audio, but the AG noted audio is the cheapest practical way to meet the requirement. Keeping only minutes and summaries does not satisfy it.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Florida law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The chairperson of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee asked Attorney General Bill McCollum whether section 383.412, Florida Statutes, requires the committee to audio-record all of its proceedings. The committee had been keeping records of the cases it discussed, the recommendations it generated, and its determinations of preventability, but it worried that audio-recording its closed sessions would harm the review process.

The AG concluded the statute requires a verbatim recording of all discussion, including the closed portions, with nothing off the record. After a 2010 amendment (Chapter 2010-40), section 383.412(3)(a) states that "[t]he closed portion of a meeting must be recorded, and no portion of the closed meeting may be off the record," and the recording is itself exempt from the Public Records Law. The AG reasoned that keeping minutes, summaries of cases, and recommendations does not produce a verbatim record, so it falls short of what the statute now demands. The statute does not specify the medium, so audio recording is not strictly required, but the AG observed it would be the most expedient and cost-efficient way to capture the full discussion.

The reason the Legislature added the recording requirement, reflected in the bill's staff analysis, was that under prior law the public had no assurance that the committees actually limited their closed sessions to confidential or exempt information. The recording requirement gives that assurance while keeping the recording itself confidential.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2010. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Background and statutory framework

Section 383.402 establishes the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee as part of a statewide, multidisciplinary system that reviews the deaths of children from birth through age 18 caused by verified child abuse or neglect. Committee chairpersons are given access to records needed to carry out the reviews.

Because those reviews involve sensitive information, section 383.412(2) makes confidential any information revealing the identity of surviving siblings, family members, or others living in the deceased child's home, and that confidentiality has no time limit. Section 383.412(3)(a) makes the portions of meetings where confidential or exempt information is discussed exempt from Florida's open meetings law (section 286.011) and Article I, section 24(b) of the constitution, while simultaneously requiring that the closed portion be recorded with nothing off the record. Section 383.412(3)(b) makes that recording exempt from the Public Records Law, and section 383.412(5) makes unauthorized disclosure of the confidential information a first-degree misdemeanor.

The AG applied the rule that an undefined statutory word gets its plain and ordinary meaning, citing Sieniarecki v. State, 756 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2000), Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000), and In re McCollam, 612 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1993), and noting a court may consult a dictionary (Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Magaha, 769 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 2000)). Using a dictionary definition of "record," the AG concluded the statute requires a reproducible capture of the discussion, not just minutes. The AG contrasted section 395.3035(4)(b), which expressly requires a certified court reporter for some closed public-hospital board meetings, to show the Legislature knew how to impose a specific recording method and chose not to here.

Citations and references

Constitutional and statutory provisions:

  • § 383.412, Fla. Stat. (recording requirement and confidentiality)
  • § 383.402, Fla. Stat. (State Child Abuse Death Review Committee)
  • § 286.011, Fla. Stat. (open meetings law and minutes)
  • § 119.07(1), Fla. Stat. and Art. I, § 24, Fla. Const. (Public Records Law)
  • Ch. 2010-40, Laws of Fla. (2010 amendment adding the recording requirement)
  • § 395.3035(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (court-reporter requirement for some hospital boards)

Cases:

  • Sieniarecki v. State, 756 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2000), plain-meaning rule
  • Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000)
  • In re McCollam, 612 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1993)
  • Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Magaha, 769 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 2000), dictionary use in construction

Source

Original opinion text

Major Connie Shingledecker

Chairperson

State Child Abuse Death Review Committee

4052 Bald Cypress Way, BIN A06

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1700

RE: PUBLIC MEETINGS – PUBLIC RECORDS – CHILD ABUSE DEATH REVIEW COMMITTEES – recording of meetings of child abuse death review committees. s. 383.412, Fla. Stat.

Dear Major Shingledecker:

On behalf of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee, you ask:

Does section 383.412, Florida Statutes, require audio recording of all proceedings of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee?

In sum:

Section 383.412, Florida Statutes, requires that all proceedings of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee be recorded such that all of the discussion is verbatim on record. While there is no specific requirement that such proceedings be audio recorded, that would appear to be an expedient and cost-efficient manner to ensure that all of the discussion is on record.

Section 383.402, Florida Statutes, establishes the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee as part of a statewide multidisciplinary, multiagency child abuse death assessment and prevention system. Under the system, state and local review committees review the facts and circumstances of all deaths of children from birth through age 18 which occur in this state as the result of verified child abuse or neglect.[1] The statute specifically provides that the chairperson of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee, or the chairperson of a local committee, shall be provided access to any information or records that pertain to a child whose death is being reviewed by the committee and that are necessary for the committee to carry out its duties.[2]

You state that the state committee historically has "recorded the closed portions of [its] meetings by maintaining records of the cases discussed, the recommendations that were generated as a result of the group discussion, and finally the determination of preventability." The committee feels that an audio recording of its closed sessions would be detrimental to the review process and questions whether its current procedures fulfill the obligations of section 383.412, Florida Statutes.

Section 383.412(2), Florida Statues, makes confidential any information that reveals the identity of the surviving siblings, family members, or others living in the home of a deceased child who is the subject of review by the state committee or a local committee.[3] Any information made confidential or exempt from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and section 24(a), Article I, Florida Constitution, which is held by the state committee or a local committee retains it confidential or exempt status without time limitations.[4]

The statute further provides that portions of meetings of the state committee or a local committee at which confidential or exempt information is discussed are exempt from Florida’s open meetings law, section 286.011, Florida Statutes, and section 24(b), Article I, State Constitution.[5] Section 383.412(3)(a), Florida Statutes, however, states that "[t]he closed portion of a meeting must be recorded, and no portion of the closed meeting may be off the record[,]" and that the “recording shall be maintained by the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee or a local committee." The recording of a closed portion of a meeting is exempt from the Public Records Law.[6] Moreover, any person who knowingly or willfully publicizes or discloses to an unauthorized person any information made confidential and exempt under section 383.412, Florida Statutes, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in section 775.082 or section 775.083, Florida Statutes.[7]

Thus, the plain language of the statute requires that the closed portion of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee meeting must be recorded, with no portion of the closed meeting off the record. Unless the context suggests otherwise, where a statute does not define a word it should be given its plain and ordinary meaning.[8] To "record" is "cause (sound, visual images) to be transferred to and registered on something (as a phonograph disc, magnetic tape) by mechanical usually electronic means in such a way that the thing so transferred and registered can (as by the use of a phonograph, tape recorder) be subsequently reproduced."[9]

Section 286.011, Florida Statutes, requires that minutes of a board or commission meeting be promptly recorded and open to public inspection. However, the recording of minutes does not produce a verbatim record of the committee’s discussion, such that the requirement that no portion of the meeting be off the record would be satisfied. Prior to its amendment by section 1, Ch. 2010-40, Laws of Florida, section 383.412, Florida Statutes, did not require the recording of the closed portions of a meeting by the state committee or a local committee. The staff analysis for the bill amending section 383.412, Florida Statutes, noted that the then current law did not require a recording of the closed portions of meetings, thereby leading to the situation that arguably "the public has no assurance that the state or local committees actually discuss confidential or exempt information during those closed sessions."[10] Discussion during consideration of the bill shows that the intent of the legislation was to require that a "recording be made of any portion of the meeting" at which confidential information is discussed.[11]

While there are other statutes which require the recording of meetings by a certified court reporter in order to assure that all portions of a meeting are on record,[12] the Legislature did not impose such a requirement in this instance. Given the general requirement that minutes of a meeting be maintained, it would appear that the Legislature intended that the committee do more than merely maintain the records that are discussed, the recommendations resulting from general discussion, and the ultimate determination to satisfy the requirements of section 383.412, Florida Statutes.

It is my opinion, therefore, that section 383.412, Florida Statutes, requires that the proceedings of the State Child Abuse Death Review Committee be recorded such that there is a verbatim recording of all discussion, whether during an open or closed portion of the meeting. While there is no specific requirement that such proceedings be audio recorded, it would appear to be the most expedient and cost-efficient manner to ensure that all discussion is recorded.

Sincerely,

Bill McCollum

Attorney General

BM/tals


[1] Section 383.402(1), Fla. Stat.

[2] Section 383.402(8), Fla. Stat.

[3] Section 383.412(2)(a), Fla. Stat.

[4] Section 383.412(2)(b), Fla. Stat.

[5] Section 383.412(3)(a), Fla. Stat.

[6] Section 383.412(3)(b), Fla. Stat. See s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I, Fla. Const., commonly referred to as the "Public Records Law."

[7] Section 383.412(5), Fla. Stat.

[8] See Sieniarecki v. State, 756 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2000); Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000); In re McCollam, 612 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1993) (when language of statute is clear and unambiguous and conveys a clear meaning, statute must be given its plain and ordinary meaning); Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Magaha, 769 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 2000) (in ascertaining the plain and ordinary meaning of a term, a court may refer to a dictionary).

[9] Webster's Third New International Dictionary p. 1898 (unabridged ed. 1981).

[10] House of Representatives Staff Analysis, HB 7113, March 15, 2010.

[11] See Florida House of Representatives, Rep. McBurney, Third Reading of HB 7113, April 19, 2010.

[12] Cf. s. 395.3035(4)(b), Fla. Stat., requiring all portions of any board meeting of the governing board of a public hospital which are closed to the public to be recorded by a certified court reporter.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2010 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.