Can Delaware deny a FOIA request just because the requester moved out of state, even if the records do not exist anyway?

Official title

23-IB04 01/25/2023 FOIA Opinion Letter to Thomas Pledgie re: FOIA Complaint Concerning the Delaware Department of Finance

Plain-English summary

Thomas Pledgie asked the Delaware Department of Finance for the audio or video recordings of three Retirement Benefit Study Committee (RBSC) meetings held in late 2021 and early 2022 over Webex. The Department initially denied the request because he was not a Delaware citizen and pointed him to meeting minutes on its website. In response to his petition, the Department also submitted an affidavit stating that the requested recordings did not exist.

The AG's office found no violation because the recordings did not exist. The Executive Assistant to the Secretary of Finance, who takes the Committee's minutes, swore that she had reviewed its records and that no audio or video of those three meetings exists. The AG found that this met the Department's burden of proof under 29 Del. C. § 10005(c). In a footnote, the AG stated that Pledgie lacked standing as a noncitizen to use Section 10005's petition process, but issued a determination as a courtesy.

What this means for you

For people requesting Delaware records from outside the state. The opinion notes, in a footnote, that as a noncitizen the requester "lack[s] standing to avail [himself] of the provisions contained in Section 10005, including the petition process set forth in Section 10005(e)." The AG issued its determination here "as a courtesy" despite that. The Department had also pointed the requester to the published meeting minutes on its website.

For Delaware public bodies handling no-records denials. The opinion holds that the Department met its burden under § 10005(c) by providing a sworn affidavit from the custodian who actually takes the Committee's minutes, attesting that she reviewed the Committee's records and that no audio or video recordings of the three meetings exist. The AG applied the Judicial Watch standard that, to meet the burden, a public body "must state, under oath, the efforts taken to determine whether there are responsive records and the results of those efforts."

Common questions

Why did the Department of Finance say Pledgie was not a citizen?
The Department denied his request because it regarded him as a noncitizen of Delaware. Pledgie said he had lived and worked in Delaware for many years before moving away. The AG's footnote states that he lacked standing as a noncitizen under Section 10005, but does not define citizenship or decide how past residency affects it.

Could Pledgie have gotten the underlying minutes instead?
The Department pointed him to minutes for the three meetings on its website. The opinion does not describe their contents.

What is the Retirement Benefit Study Committee?
It is a committee whose meetings are handled through the Department of Finance; the opinion involves recordings of three of its 2021-2022 Webex meetings. The opinion does not describe the Committee's mandate in detail, but it confirms the Department posts the Committee's meeting minutes on its website.

Does the noncitizen-standing point control the outcome?
The AG decided the case on the no-records ground and addressed citizenship only in a footnote, where it stated that as a noncitizen the requester lacked standing under Section 10005, including the 10005(e) petition process. The AG still issued the determination "as a courtesy."

Background and statutory framework

Delaware FOIA, 29 Del. C. §§ 10001-10007, provides that "[a]ll public records shall be open to inspection and copying during regular business hours by the custodian of the records for the appropriate public body" and that "[r]easonable access to and reasonable facilities for copying of these records shall not be denied to any citizen." Section 10005(c) puts the burden of proof on the public body to justify any denial of access. Section 10005(e) opens the petition process for AG review to "[a]ny citizen."

The opinion cites Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Univ. of Del., 267 A.3d 996 (Del. 2021), for the rule that "unless it is clear on the face of the request that the demanded records are not subject to FOIA, to meet the burden of proof under Section 10005(c), a public body must state, under oath, the efforts taken to determine whether there are responsive records and the results of those efforts." 267 A.3d at 1012. The Department supplied an affidavit from the Executive Assistant who takes the Committee's minutes, attesting that the recordings do not exist.

The AG addressed citizenship in a footnote while issuing a courtesy determination on the merits. It found no violation because the requested recordings did not exist.

Citations

• 29 Del. C. § 10003: public records access
• 29 Del. C. § 10005(c): burden of proof on public body
• 29 Del. C. § 10005(e): citizen petition process
• 29 Del. C. §§ 10001-10007: Delaware FOIA generally
• Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Univ. of Del., 267 A.3d 996 (Del. 2021): sworn-affidavit requirement to meet § 10005(c) burden

Source

• Landing page: https://attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/2023/01/25/23-ib04-01-25-2023-foia-opinion-letter-to-thomas-pledgie-re-foia-complaint-concerning-the-delaware-department-of-finance/
• Original PDF: https://attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2023/01/Attorney-General-Opinion-No.-23-IB04.pdf

Original opinion text

KATHLEEN JENNINGS
ATTORNEY GENERAL

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
820 NORTH FRENCH STREET
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801

CIVIL DIVISION (302) 577-8400
CRIMINAL DIVISION (302) 577-8500
DIVISION CIVIL RIGHTS & PUBLIC TRUST (302) 577-5400
FAMILY DIVISION (302) 577-8400
FRAUD DIVISION (302) 577-8600
FAX (302) 577-2610

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Attorney General Opinion No. 23-IB04
January 25, 2023
VIA EMAIL
Thomas Pledgie
[email protected]

RE: FOIA Petition Regarding the Delaware Department of Finance

Dear Mr. Pledgie:
We write regarding your correspondence alleging that the Delaware Department of Finance violated the Delaware Freedom of Information Act, 29 Del. C. §§ 10001-10007 ("FOIA"). We treat your correspondence as a Petition for a determination pursuant to 29 Del. C. § 10005 regarding whether a violation of FOIA has occurred or is about to occur. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the Department did not violate FOIA by denying access to the requested records.

BACKGROUND
On December 5, 2022, you requested certain recordings of the Retirement Benefit Study Committee meetings, specifically the "audio and/or video of RBSC Nov[.] 29, 2021 Meeting (Webex Event no. 2334 526 6708), RBSC Feb[.] 28, 2022 Meeting (Webex Event no. 2334 900 6473), and RBSC Meeting Mar[.] 24, 2022 (Webex Event no. 2344 263 3169)." 1 The Department responded on December 27, 2022, denying your request because you are not a citizen of Delaware. Notwithstanding its denial, the Department pointed you to the minutes for these meetings available on its website. This Petition followed, in which you appealed this denial and questioned the requirements for being a Delaware citizen, noting that you lived and worked in Delaware for many years before moving out of state.

1 Petition.

The Department's counsel responded to the Petition on its behalf ("Response") and included an affidavit from the Executive Assistant to the Secretary of Finance. The Executive Assistant attests that she takes the minutes for the Committee and has access to the records of the Committee. She states under oath that she has reviewed the records of the Committee and no audio or video recordings of the meetings held on the dates referenced in your request exist. The Department also asserts that as you are not a citizen of Delaware, you are not entitled to access public records under FOIA, and you lack standing to avail yourself of the FOIA enforcement provisions. Additionally, the Department contends that the Petition fails to meet the requirements of 29 Del. C. § 10005(e) and the Petition is moot.

DISCUSSION
FOIA requires a public body to provide citizens with reasonable access to public records in accordance with the statute. 2 In any action brought under Section 10005, the public body has the burden of proof to justify its denial of access to records. 3 The Department provided the affidavit of the Executive Assistant responsible for taking the meeting minutes who attested that she reviewed the records of the Committee and the recordings you requested do not exist. Accordingly, we find that the Department met its burden of proof to demonstrate that its denial of access to the records you requested was proper. 4

2 29 Del. C. § 10003.
3 29 Del. C. § 10005(c).
4 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Univ. of Del., 267 A.3d 996, 1012 (Del. 2021). ("[U]nless it is clear on the face of the request that the demanded records are not subject to FOIA, to meet the burden of proof under Section 10005(c), a public body must state, under oath, the efforts taken to determine whether there are responsive records and the results of those efforts.").

CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we determine that in these circumstances, the Department did not violate FOIA by denying access to the requested records. 5

Very truly yours,
/s/ Alexander S. Mackler
__________
Alexander S. Mackler
Chief Deputy Attorney General

cc:
Edward J. Kosmowski, Deputy Attorney General
Dorey L. Cole, Deputy Attorney General

5 While we have decided to issue a determination here as a courtesy, we feel compelled to note that as a noncitizen, you lack standing to avail yourself of the provisions contained in Section 10005, including the petition process set forth in Section 10005(e).