Did a Connecticut first selectperson who performed police functions need police training?

Short answer The AG said a first selectperson empowered to perform police functions had to complete a basic training course prescribed by the Municipal Police Training Council. He declined to decide whether a given municipality had lawfully given its first selectperson those powers.
State
Connecticut
Opinion
Formal Opinion 1995-13
Issued
April 4, 1995
Issued by
Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut
Requested by
T. William Knapp, Executive Director, Municipal Police Training Council

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current Connecticut law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Connecticut Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In April 1995, Connecticut’s AG answered the Municipal Police Training Council’s question about first selectpersons exercising law enforcement powers. He declined to determine whether a first selectperson gained such powers from the office of municipal chief executive, a charter or an ordinance. Those local government questions, including the validity of any grant of authority, belonged to the municipality’s legal counsel.

For the council’s training jurisdiction, the AG gave a conditional answer. If a first selectperson was empowered to perform police functions, the then-current statute required successful completion of a basic training course prescribed by the council. The opinion described police functions as including criminal or traffic law enforcement, public order, protection of life or property, and crime prevention or investigation. It also distinguished the specific curriculum for statutory police officers and probationary candidates from other appropriate council curricula for people performing police functions under a different appointment source.

Municipal officials at the time

The opinion did not validate any particular town’s assignment of police authority to a first selectperson. It said local counsel should address that threshold question.

Police training officials at the time

Once a person was validly empowered to perform police functions, the council could require basic training. The applicable curriculum could differ from that prescribed for statutory police officers.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1995. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did the title “first selectperson” alone confer police powers?
A: The AG declined to decide that local government question and referred it to municipal legal counsel.

Q: Did a first selectperson with police functions need training?
A: Yes. The opinion said the council’s basic training requirement applied when that person was empowered to perform police functions.

Q: Was the exact police officer curriculum required for every first selectperson?
A: No. The AG said the council could set an appropriate curriculum for someone outside the statutory police officer or probationary candidate categories who nonetheless performed police functions.

Background and statutory framework

The AG separated local power questions under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-148(c)(4) from the council’s training authority under § 7-294d(e). His answer on training assumed a lawful grant of police functions; it did not establish one.

Citations and references

Statutes: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d(e); Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-148(c)(4).

Source

Original opinion text

T. William Knapp, Municipal Police Training Council, 1995-013 Formal Opinion, Attorney General of Connecticut

Attorney General's Opinion

Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal

April 4, 1995

T. William Knapp

Executive Director

Municipal Police Training Council

285 Preston Street

Meriden, CT 06450-4891

Dear Mr. Knapp:

You have requested our advice on whether first selectpersons who exercise criminal law enforcement powers must successfully complete the training requirements established by the Municipal Police Training Council ("MPTC") pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d. Your letter asks four questions:

Does a first selectperson, by virtue of the designation of "chief executive officer" of the municipality in which he or she presides, have law enforcement powers? If the answer is "yes," is the person subject to the mandatory training requirements set by the Municipal Police Training Council?

Does a first selectperson, by virtue of a local ordinance or charter provision designating said person as the local "chief of police," have law enforcement powers? If the answer to this question is "yes," is the person subject to the mandatory training requirements set by the Municipal Police Training Council?

Unfortunately, we cannot answer your questions concerning the "law enforcement powers" conferred on first selectpersons by their municipalities. These questions involve legal issues regarding the organization of local governments which is a matter of local concern. See e.g. Shelton v. Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection, 193 Conn. 506, 521, 479 A.2d 208 (1984); and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-148(c)(4).1 Questions regarding whether a municipality has, in fact and as a matter of law, bestowed law enforcement powers upon its chief executive officer or designated its chief executive officer the "Chief of Police" should be addressed and answered by the municipality's legal counsel. See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 3-125; and 84 Conn. Op. Atty. Gen. 146, 148 (1984) (letter to Colonel Lester J. Forst, Commissioner, Department of Public Safety, April 5, 1985). Similarly, legal questions regarding the specific authority for and validity of the grant of law enforcement powers to, or the assumption of such powers by, the chief executive officer, should be addressed to the legal counsel for the municipality.

In considering your remaining questions, we undertake an analysis of the legal issues strictly from the standpoint of advising the MPTC as to its authority to impose mandatory training requirements on those individuals empowered to perform "police functions" as that term is used in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d(e).2 Earlier, we advised you that persons who perform police functions, unless specifically exempted by statute, must successfully complete a basic training program as established by the MPTC. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d; --- Conn. Op. Atty. Gen. --- (1993) (Letter to T. William Knapp, Executive Director, Municipal Police Training Council, September 21, 1993). We determined that a person performs police functions when he or she is required to do one or more of the following activities: the "(1) enforcement of criminal or traffic laws, (2) preservation of public order, (3) the protection of life or property, and (4) the prevention, detection or investigation of crime." Id, at 4.

The state has a broad public concern in assuring that those individuals who perform police functions within this state meet a minimum level of proficiency in the exercise of law enforcement powers by completing a basic training course as established by the MPTC under Conn. Gen. Stat. §7-294d et seq. Therefore, in answer to your second and fourth questions, if a first selectperson is empowered to perform police functions, then Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d(e) requires, that he or she successfully complete a basic training course as prescribed by the MPTC. However, as we stated in our 1993 opinion, all persons who exercise police functions need not receive the same training:

All persons exercising police functions in the State of Connecticut, however, are not required to receive the same training. The specific training requirements set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d are applicable only to "police officers" or "probationary candidates;" police officers who have not yet satisfied the MPTC training requirements. Persons falling outside the statutory definition of police officer or probationary candidate, who nonetheless perform police functions, are not subject to those specific requirements. Thus, the MPTC has the authority to formulate other appropriate training curricula for persons performing police functions as a prerequisite to their certification, depending on the statutory source of their appointment and the individual needs of their respective offices.

--- Conn. Op. Atty. Gen. --- (1993) (Letter to T. William Knapp, Executive Director, Municipal Police Training Counsel, September 21, 1993, p. 3., fn. 2).

Please do not hesitate to request further clarification should you require additional guidance.

Very truly yours,

Richard Blumenthal

Attorney General

Ronald E. Naves, Jr.

Assistant Attorney General

RB/ren

1 This statute states in relevant part:

Any municipality shall have the power to do any of the following, in addition to all powers granted to municipalities under the constitution and general statutes: ... (4) Public services. (A) Provide for police protection, regulate and prescribe the duties of the persons providing police protection with respect to criminal matters within the limits of the municipality and maintain and regulate a suitable place of detention within the limits of the municipality for the safekeeping of all persons arrested and awaiting trial and do all other things necessary or desirable for the policing of the municipality.

2 Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-294d(e) makes the Municipal Police Training Council provisions of the General Statutes applicable "to any person who performs police functions."

What does Connecticut law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1995. Ezel checks the current Connecticut statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace