Did a 1994 Connecticut law make chronic hospital property grants payable for 1993–94?

Short answer Yes. After a new law expressly applied the chronic disease hospital grant provision to fiscal 1993–94, the AG said those grants could begin with that year and that his earlier May 24 opinion was superseded.
State
Connecticut
Opinion
Formal Opinion 1994-22
Issued
August 23, 1994
Issued by
Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut
Requested by
Susan Shimelman, Secretary, Office of Policy and Management

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current Connecticut law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Connecticut Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In August 1994, Connecticut’s AG reversed his earlier answer about state payments in lieu of property taxes for free-standing chronic disease hospitals. In May, he had said the new property category could first count for fiscal 1994–95, because the prior-year assessment list governed and the original amendment took effect July 1, 1993. The legislature then enacted a new provision expressly applying the grant language to fiscal 1993–94 and every year afterward. The AG said this superseded his May 24 opinion, now published here as Formal Opinion 1994-12.

Under the later act, the AG identified fiscal 1993–94 as the first permitted grant year and September 1993 as the first permitted payment date. He said the state should calculate that grant using the hospital property’s assessed value on the October 1, 1991 grand list, two years before the fiscal year at issue. This is a historical reading of a specific retroactive 1994 enactment, not a general rule about present grants.

Municipal and state finance officials at the time

The later act changed the answer for the earlier fiscal year. The AG expressly withdrew the operative timing conclusion from his May opinion.

Chronic disease hospitals at the time

The opinion concerned state grants to municipalities tied to qualifying hospital property, rather than a direct hospital payment.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1994. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Was 1993–94 eligible after the new law?
A: Yes. The AG said the 1994 act expressly applied the grant provision to that fiscal year and superseded his earlier contrary opinion.

Q: Which assessment list controlled the first grant?
A: The AG identified the October 1, 1991 grand list for the 1993–94 grant calculation.

Q: Why did the AG change his answer?
A: The General Assembly added retroactive application language after his May 1994 analysis of the original amendment’s effective date.

Background and statutory framework

The May opinion had read Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-20a under a 1993 amendment that took effect prospectively. Section 15 of 1994 Conn. Pub. Act No. 94-6 reworked the grant provision, and its effective-date section made it applicable beginning in fiscal 1993–94. The AG treated that express language as controlling over the earlier opinion.

Citations and references

Statutes: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-20a; 1994 Conn. Pub. Act No. 94-6.

Source

Original opinion text

Susan Shimelman , Secretary, Office of Policy and Management , 1994-022 Formal Opinion, Attorney General of Connecticut

Attorney General's Opinion

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal

August 23, 1994

Susan Shimelman

Secretary, Office of Policy and Management

80 Washington Street

Hartford, CT 06106

Dear Ms. Shimelman:

By letter dated July 6, 1994, your office made an inquiry pertaining to § 15 of 1994 Conn. Pub. Act No. 94-6 of the May Special Session (hereinafter the "1994 Act"). The July 6, 1994 letter phrased the question as follows:

Subsequent to your legal opinion of May 24, 1994, the General Assembly passed Public Act 94-6(15), copy enclosed, which provides for a definition of 'Free Standing Chronic Disease Hospitals' applicable retroactively to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1993. As a result of this amendment, we respectfully request a formal opinion on the impact this revision has in relationship to the grand list year and fiscal year Free Standing Chronic Disease Hospitals payments should commence.
The request refers to our opinion dated May 24, 1994, in which we advised your office that a municipality would not be entitled to a grant in lieu of taxes under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-20a for chronic disease hospitals located within its geographical confines for state fiscal year 1993-1994. The basis for this conclusion was the effective date of 1993 Conn. Pub. Act No. 93-388 (hereinafter "1993 Act") which modified the type of property eligible for a state grant-in-lieu of taxes under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-20a. The 1993 Act included "free standing chronic disease hospitals" within its ambit. The 1993 Act became effective on July 1, 1993. We, therefore, concluded, that municipalities could claim free standing chronic disease hospitals for a state grant prospectively after July 1, 1993. Since in any particular year an application for a grant is based on the grand list of October first in the prior year, we concluded that the first year a municipality could claim the subject hospitals was for state fiscal year 1994-1995, based on the grand list of October 1, 1993 and payable in September, 1994.

Since the issuance of our opinion, the General Assembly passed and the Governor signed the 1994 Act. Section 15 of that Act constitutes a repeal and substitution of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-20a with the only ostensible change being the inclusion of a definition of "free standing chronic disease hospital."

Our inquiry focuses on the effective date section of the 1994 Act. That provision states in relevant part:

Sec. 28. This act shall take effect from its passage, except that . . . section 15 shall be applicable to the grant-in-lieu of taxes made in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1993, and each fiscal year thereafter, . . .
(Emphasis added.)

In view of the language set forth in section 28 of the 1994 Act, we believe the Legislature intended to provide grants for chronic disease hospitals commencing with the State's 1993-1994 fiscal year. In light of this, the 1994 Act supersedes our May 24, 1994, opinion. In answer to the question, the first fiscal year that a grant for a chronic disease hospital would have been allowed is fiscal year 1993-1994. Since such grants are paid in September, the first payment was permitted in September, 1993. Furthermore, the grant made in 1993 "shall be equal to sixty percent of the property taxes which . . . would have been paid with respect to such exempt real property on the assessment list in such municipality for the assessment date two years prior to the commencement of the state fiscal year in which such grant is payable". Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-20a as amended by § 15 of 1994 Conn. Pub. Act No. 94-6 (May Special Session). This means OPM must calculate its grant based on the assessed value for the property as it appeared on the grand list of October 1, 1991, which is two years prior to the 1993 State fiscal year. We trust this answers the questions posed.

Very truly yours,

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL

ATTORNEY GENERAL

William J. Prensky

Assistant Attorney General

RB/WJP/wp

What does Connecticut law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Connecticut statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace