Could a Connecticut advanced practice nurse prescribe medication in private practice in 1994?

Short answer The AG said advanced practice registered nurses could prescribe only in the four settings listed in the statute at that time. A general regulation covering nursing practice in any setting did not specifically authorize prescribing in private practice.
State
Connecticut
Opinion
Formal Opinion 1994-04
Issued
February 16, 1994
Issued by
Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut
Requested by
Janice Thibodeau, R.N., Chairperson, Board of Examiners for Nursing

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current Connecticut law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Connecticut Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In February 1994, Connecticut’s AG answered a narrow question about advanced practice registered nurses in private practice. The statute then gave APRNs prescriptive authority in four specified settings and let the Department of Public Health and Addiction Services designate additional settings by regulation. The department had adopted a regulation referring to advanced nursing activities “in any setting.” The AG concluded that this general language did not add a private practice setting for prescribing. Until a regulation specified another setting, APRNs could prescribe only in those the statute listed.

The opinion separated an APRN’s advanced nursing activities from the authority to prescribe medication. It also relied on the statute’s list of particular institutions and clinics: the phrase allowing “other settings” called for an identifiable place or environment in a regulation, rather than a general statement about professional standards wherever an APRN practiced.

APRNs and private practices at the time

The general “any setting” regulation did not confer prescribing authority in a private practice office. The AG tied that authority to the specific statutory settings and any later setting specifically added by regulation.

Nursing regulators at the time

The department had power to identify additional prescribing settings, but the AG said it had not exercised that power through the regulation before him.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1994. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could a Connecticut APRN prescribe medication from a private practice office in 1994?
A: The AG said no, unless the department specifically designated that setting by regulation. The existing general regulation did not do so.

Q: Did a rule allowing advanced nursing activities “in any setting” also allow prescribing everywhere?
A: No. The AG read that rule as setting standards for how APRNs practiced, without expanding the places where they could prescribe.

Q: Could the health department add more prescribing settings?
A: Yes. The statute delegated that choice to the department through regulations naming additional settings.

Background and statutory framework

Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(b) listed four categories of institutions and clinics and permitted “any other settings” prescribed by regulation under Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-99a. The AG found Conn. Agencies Reg. § 20-87a-1 too general to designate an additional prescribing site.

Citations and references

Statutes and regulation: Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(b); Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-99a; Conn. Agencies Reg. § 20-87a-1.

Source

Original opinion text

Janice Thibodeau, R.N. , Board of Examiners for Nursing , 1994-004 Formal Opinion, Attorney General of Connecticut

Attorney General's Opinion

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal

February 16, 1994

Janice Thibodeau, R.N.

Chairperson

Board of Examiners for Nursing

Department of Public Health and Addiction Services

150 Washington Street

Hartford, CT 06106

Dear Ms. Thibodeau:

This is in response to an October 19, 1993 request for an opinion regarding the prescriptive authority of advanced practice registered nurses ("APRNs"), which request was generated by Marie Hilliard, the Board's Executive Officer. The question is whether APRNs have prescriptive authority in a private practice setting. The answer is that APRNs may exercise prescriptive authority only in the settings specified in Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(1) through (4), unless and until the Department promulgates regulations specifically permitting APRNs to prescribe medication in a private practice setting.

As Dr. Hilliard noted in her letter, the legislature has prescribed four specific practice settings in which APRNs may prescribe medication, as well as "any other settings that may be prescribed by regulations adopted pursuant to" § 20-99a of the statutes. Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(b).1 The only pertinent regulation promulgated by the Department is Connecticut Agencies Reg. § 20-87a-1, which provides:

Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse who performs advanced level nursing practice activities shall do so in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of chapter 378 of the general statutes and sections 2 through 6, inclusive, of these regulations in any setting, including a setting that is not already set forth in subsection (b) of section 20-87a. (Emphasis added).
The APRNs urge a broad reading of this regulation, so that they would be permitted to prescribe medication in any setting. However, this interpretation of the regulation is untenable. This regulation merely states that, in whatever setting APRNs exercise prescriptive authority, they must do so in a manner that is consistent with the relevant statutes. Conn. Agencies Reg. § 20-87a-1. It is not sufficiently specific to expand the settings in which APRNs may prescribe medication. This requirement of specificity is derived from the statute and by application of the rules of statutory construction. In general, statutes should be construed so as to give effect to the intent of the legislature. State v. Parmalee, 197 Conn. 158, 161, 496 A.2d 186 (1985) (citation omitted); Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pasion, 219 Conn. 764, 768-69, 594 A.2d 468 (1991) (citing Sanzone v. Board of Police Commissioners, 219 Conn. 179, 186, 592 A.2d 912 (1991)). "When the words of a statute are plain and unambiguous, we need look no further for interpretive guidance because we assume that the words themselves express the intention of the legislature." Rhodes v. Hartford, 201 Conn. 89, 93, 513 A.2d 124 (1986) (citation omitted). Here, the statutes clearly delegate to the Department the authority to define the settings in which APRNs may exercise prescriptive authority. Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 20-87a(b), 20-99a.2 Section 20-87a(b) itself states that APRNs shall have prescriptive authority in "any other settings that may be prescribed by regulations...." Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(b). The legislature delegated broad discretion to the Department in defining the settings in which APRNs could practice.3 However, the Department cannot be said to have enumerated any settings other than those set forth in Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(1) through (4). "Under the maxim of 'noscitur a socis,' the meaning of a particular word or phrase in a statute is ascertained by reference to those words or phrases with which it is associated." Staples v. Palten, 214 Conn. 195, 199, 571 A.2d 97 (1990) (citing Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 472 U.S. 1, 8, 105 S.Ct. 2548, 86 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985) (other citations omitted)). The statute itself sets forth four specific places or environments in which APRNs may prescribe medication, and then provides the Department with the authority to identify other specific "settings" if it chooses to do so. Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(5). The legislature's list of specific places or environments indicates that the word "settings" in Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(5) refers to other specific places or environments which might be designated by the Department in regulations promulgated pursuant to Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 20-87a(b) and 20-99a. Thus, Conn. Agencies Reg. § 20-87a-1 does not expand the settings in which APRNs may exercise prescriptive authority because it lists no other specific places or environments in which APRNs may prescribe medication. Although the legislature delegated to the Department the authority to promulgate regulations identifying settings other than those listed in Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a, the Department has not done so. Conn. Agencies Reg. § 20-87a-1 sets forth no specific places or environments in which APRNs may prescribe medication. As such, the Department cannot be said to have identified any other settings in which APRNs may practice. Thus, APRNs may prescribe medication only in those settings set forth in Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 20-87a(1) through (4), unless and until the Department promulgates appropriate regulations in which such settings are specified.

Very truly yours,

Richard Blumenthal

Attorney General

Jennifer C. Jaff

Assistant Attorney General

RB/JCJ

Footnote:

1 Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a(b) provides in full:

Advanced nursing practice is defined as the performance of advanced level nursing practice activities which, by virtue of postbasic specialized education and experience, are appropriate to and may be performed by an advanced practice registered nurse. The advanced practice registered nurse performs acts of diagnosis and treatment of alterations in health status, as described in subsection (a) of this section. The advanced practice registered nurse may, under the direction of a physician licensed to practice medicine in this state and in accordance with written protocols, and if practicing in (1) an institution licensed pursuant to subsection (a) of § 19a-491 as a hospital, home for the aged, health care facility for the handicapped, nursing home, rest home, mental health facility, substance abuse treatment facility, infirmary operated by an educational institution for the care of students enrolled in, and faculty and staff of, such institution, or facility operated and maintained by any state agency and providing services for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment or care of human health conditions, or (2) an industrial health facility licensed pursuant to subsection (h) of § 31-374 which serves at least two thousand employees, or (3) a clinic operated by a state agency, municipality, or private nonprofit corporation, or (4) a clinic operated by any educational institution prescribed by regulations adopted pursuant to § 20-99a, or (5) any other settings that may be prescribed by regulations adopted pursuant to said section, prescribe, dispense, and administer medical therapeutics and corrective measures, except that an advanced practice registered nurse licensed pursuant to § 20-94a and maintaining current certification from the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists who is prescribing and administering medical therapeutics during surgery may only do so if the physician who is medically directing the prescriptive activity is physically present in the institution, clinic, or other prescribed setting where such surgery is being performed. (Emphasis added).
2 Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-99a provides that "[t]he department of public health and addiction services shall, with the advice and assistance of the board, adopt regulations necessary for the implementation of this chapter."

3 Of course, the Department is limited by the other legislative provisions relating to APRNs, as well as to nurses in general. Conn.Gen.Stat. § 20-87a et seq.

What does Connecticut law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current Connecticut statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace