AR Opinion No. 2017-041 April 10, 2017

Why did the Arkansas AG reject Larry Morris's second 2017 recreational-marijuana ballot title?

Short answer: Rejected. AG Rutledge declined certification of Larry Morris's second 2017 recreational-marijuana proposal. Four ambiguities prevented certification: inconsistent use of 'business,' 'person,' and 'driver' in Section 3(g), uncertainty about whether design and packaging requirements applied universally, the recurring expungement ambiguity in Section 8, and questions about whether state actors could be held liable under the Section 10 penalty provisions.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2017. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Arkansas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2017
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Arkansas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Arkansas attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Larry B. Morris of West Fork resubmitted his recreational-marijuana constitutional amendment to Attorney General Leslie Rutledge after the first version was rejected (Op. 2017-031). The April 10 version addressed some of the earlier issues but introduced or retained four ambiguities that the AG flagged as serious enough to prevent certification.

  1. Section 3(g) "business," "person," and "driver" usage. The proposal used the three terms inconsistently when describing transport-pass requirements. It was unclear whose name had to appear on the pass.
  2. Section 4(c)(3) packaging exemption. The provision required products produced from recreational marijuana to be designed and packaged "pursuant to section 5," but the section's interaction with non-sale distribution was unclear. The same kind of "what does this exemption actually cover?" problem the AG had flagged in parallel Berry proposals.
  3. Section 8 expungement. Same recurring ambiguity. Two reasonable readings of which convictions get expunged and what "other conviction not pertaining to" means. Because expungement is a high-stakes voter consideration, the ambiguity was disqualifying.
  4. Section 10 sovereign immunity. The criminal-penalty provisions raised the question of whether state actors (officials, employees) could be held personally liable, and how that interacted with the state's sovereign-immunity protections. The AG flagged this as "noteworthy" given the state's structural protections.

Because the underlying proposal text was internally ambiguous, the AG could not draft a substitute under § 7-9-107(b). She rejected the petition under § 7-9-107(c) and invited Mr. Morris to redesign and resubmit. The next iteration appears as Op. 2017-047.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2017. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: How does this proposal relate to the earlier Morris submission?
A: Op. 2017-031 (March 21) was Mr. Morris's first attempt and was rejected for seven ambiguities. This April 10 version addressed several of those earlier issues, but the AG identified four that were still serious enough to require redesign. Op. 2017-047 (May 3) was Mr. Morris's third attempt; the AG found a different set of ambiguities there.

Q: What is the sovereign-immunity problem in Section 10?
A: Section 10 enumerated criminal penalties for violations of the proposed amendment. The AG read those penalties as raising the question of whether state actors could be held personally liable. Arkansas's constitution and statutes contain substantial sovereign-immunity protections; the proposed amendment did not address how its penalties would interact with those protections. That left voters guessing about meaningful aspects of enforcement.

Q: Why does the AG keep flagging the expungement clause?
A: Because every iteration of these proposals from 2017 contained the same Section 8 wording, with the same two competing readings. The AG's office treats expungement as a particularly important matter for voters (it changes the criminal record of identifiable individuals), so ambiguity here is not the kind of issue the AG will paper over with a substitute ballot title.

Q: Did Mr. Morris ever get a proposal certified?
A: Not in this 2017 sequence. The proposals went through three rounds (Op. 2017-031, 2017-041, 2017-047) without certification. The 2018 Arkansas ballot did not include a recreational-marijuana measure from this sequence.

Q: What does it mean that "additional ambiguities may come to light"?
A: Standard caveat. The AG identifies the most serious ambiguities but does not commit to having found them all. A revised proposal may surface new issues. Sponsors who treat the rejection list as exhaustive risk repeated rejections.

Background and statutory framework

The Arkansas initiative-and-referendum process requires AG certification of the popular name and ballot title before petitions can be circulated. Section 7-9-107 sets out the AG's authority. The Arkansas Supreme Court's case law on ballot-title sufficiency requires honest, intelligible, impartial summaries that convey "an intelligible idea of the scope and significance of a proposed change in the law."

Recreational-marijuana proposals during the 2017 to 2018 cycle accumulated a track record of rejections. The recurring ambiguities (expungement wording, packaging-exemption interactions, sovereign-immunity silence, definitional inconsistency, silence on Amendment 98) suggest that the underlying drafting tradition for these proposals was not addressing the AG's concerns. The proposals never made it to the ballot.

Citations and references

Statutes:

  • Ark. Code Ann. § 7-9-107 (popular name and ballot title certification)
  • Ark. Code Ann. § 7-5-309 (voting-booth time limit)

Cases (all Arkansas Supreme Court):

  • Kurrus v. Priest, 342 Ark. 434, 29 S.W.3d 669 (2000)
  • Pafford v. Hall, 217 Ark. 734, 233 S.W.2d 72 (1950)
  • May v. Daniels, 359 Ark. 100, 194 S.W.3d 771 (2004)
  • Becker v. Riviere, 270 Ark. 219, 604 S.W.2d 555 (1980)
  • Lange v. Martin, 2016 Ark. 337, 500 S.W.3d 154
  • Wilson v. Martin, 2016 Ark. 334, 500 S.W.3d 160
  • Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277, 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994)
  • Crochet v. Priest, 326 Ark. 338, 931 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
  • Roberts v. Priest, 341 Ark. 813, 20 S.W.3d 376 (2000)

Source

Original opinion text

Opinion No. 2017-041
April 10, 2017
Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
50 Crest Street
West Fork, AR 72774
Dear Mr. Morris:
STATE OF ARKANSAS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
LESLIE RUTLEDGE
I am writing in response to your request for certification, pursuant to Ark. Code
Ann. § 7-9-107 (Supp. 2015), of the popular name and ballot title for a proposed
initiated measure.
At the outset, I wish to make clear to you that the decision to certify or reject
a popular name and ballot title is in no way a reflection of my view of the
merits of a particular proposal. I am not authorized to, and do not, consider
the merits of the measure when making my determination to certify or reject
a popular name and ballot title.
The Attorney General is required, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 7-9-107, to certify
the popular name and ballot title of all proposed initiative and referendum acts or
amendments before the petitions are circulated for signature. The law provides that
the Attorney General may, if practicable, substitute and certify a more suitable and
correct popular name and ballot title. Or, if the proposed popular name and ballot
title are sufficiently misleading, the Attorney General may reject the entire
petition.
Section 7-9-107 neither requires nor authorizes this office to make legal
determinations concerning the merits of the act or amendment, or concerning the
likelihood that it will accomplish its stated objective. In addition, consistent with
Arkansas Supreme Court precedent, unless the measure is "clearly contrary to
323 CENTER STREET, SUITE 200 · LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
TELEPHONE (501) 682-2007 · FAX (501) 682-8084
ARKANSASAG.GOV Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
Opinion No. 2017-041
Page 2
law,"1 this office will not require that a measure's proponents acknowledge in the
ballot title any possible constitutional infirmities.2 Consequently, this review has
been limited primarily to a determination, pursuant to the guidelines that have
been set forth by the Arkansas Supreme Court, discussed below, of whether the
popular name and ballot title you have submitted accurately and impartially
summarize the provisions of your proposal.
The purpose of my review and certification is to ensure that the popular name and
ballot title honestlr, intelligibly, and fairly set forth the purpose of the proposed
amendment or act.
REQUEST
You have requested certification, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 7-9-107, of
the following popular name and ballot title for a proposed constitutional
amendment:
Popular Name
The Arkansas Decriminalization of Recreational Marijuana Amendment
Ballot Title
An amendment to the Arkansas Constitution concerning the
marijuana plant, providing that the cultivation, production,
distribution, sale, possession, and use of marijuana and products
produced therefrom for recreational purposes by adults 21 years of
age or older may not be prohibited under State law; recognizing that
such activities remain unlawful under federal law; providing for the
release from incarceration, probation, or parole of all persons whose
current and only conviction(s) in which they are serving were of
State laws pertaining to the cultivation, production, distribution, sale,
1 See Kurrus v. Priest, 342 Ark. 434, 445, 29 S.W.3d 669, 675 (2000); Donovan v. Priest, 326
Ark. 353, 359, 931S.W.2d119, 121 (1996); Plugge v. McCuen, 310 Ark. 654, 841S.W.2d139
(1992).
2 As part of my review, however, I may address constitutional concerns for consideration by the
measure's proponents.
3 See Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. Riviere, 283 Ark. 463, 466, 677 S.W.2d 846 (1984). Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
Opinion No. 2017-041
Page 3
and possession of marijuana, possession of marijuana paraphernalia,
and or the unlawful use of communication devices to sell marijuana,
and the expungement of each and every criminal records [sic] in the
State relating to such conviction(s); defining recreational marijuana
containing more than 0.3% THC; permitting the cultivation,
production, distribution, and sale of recreational marijuana by any
business or person 21 years of age or older; providing that a business
and anyone 21 years of age or older may cultivate, produce, and sell
marijuana and products produced therefrom for recreational
purposes; providing that a person or business may cultivate up to 25
mature and 25 non mature marijuana plants in a location not subject
to public view without optical aid; providing that the location of 25
or more cultivating marijuana plants is put on record with the county
sheriffs office; permitting the transport of recreational marijuana
upon any public highway or street provided if the weight of transport
exceeds 4lbs [sic] or more a transport pass is obtained from the
county sheriffs office; providing that sales of recreational marijuana
will be subject to existing sales taxes and an additional 5%
recreational marijuana excise tax and a local sales tax of 2%;
permitting any business that is 1500 feet away or more from a public
or private school, church, or daycare may sell recreational marijuana
to any person 21 years of age or older; providing that the
recreational marijuana that is sold in the form of edibles or
drinkables (a)is [sic] not designed to appeal to children; (b) shall not
exceed 10 milligrams of THC per serving, and ( c) labeling or
packaging must provide product information; providing that the
manufacture, possession, purchase, sale, and distribution of
marijuana paraphernalia is lawful under State law; and providing
that the amendment (a) is not intended to require employers to
permit activities relating to recreational marijuana in the workplace,
(b) is not intended to permit driving under the influence of
marijuana, ( c) is not intended to permit the transfer of recreational
marijuana to anyone under 21 years of age, ( d) does not permit
anyone under 21 years of age to cultivate, produce, sell, possess, or
use recreational marijuana and; ( e) does not prohibit the State from
appointing a regulatory body to regulate the cultivation, production,
distribution and sale of recreational marijuana pursuant to the
amendment and (f) is not intended to limit any privileges or rights of
a qualifying patient, caregiver, physician, or, any license entity
pursuant to the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2016. Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
Opinion No. 2017-041
Page 4
RESPONSE
The popular name is primarily a useful legislative device.4 It need not contain
detailed information or include exceptions that might be required of a ballot title,
but it must not be misleading or give partisan coloring to the merit of the
proposal. 5 The popular name is to be considered together with the ballot title in
determining the ballot title's sufficiency.6
The ballot title must include an impartial summary of the proposed amendment or
act that will give the voter a fair understanding of the issues presented.7 According
to the Court, a ballot title will not be legally sufficient unless it "adequately
inform[ s ]" the voters of the contents of a proposed amendment or act so that they
can make a "reasoned decision in the voting booth."8 A ballot title's failure to
"honestly and accurately reflect what is contained in the proposed [act or]
Amendment" may lead the Court to conclude that the "omission is significant."9
The Court has also disapproved the use of terms that are "technical and not readily
understood by voters."10 Without a definition of such terms in the ballot title, the
title may be deemed insufficient. 11
Additionally, if information omitted from the ballot title is an "essential fact which
would give the voter serious ground for reflection, it must be disclosed."12 At the
4 Pajfordv. Hall, 217 Ark. 734, 739, 233 S.W.2d 72, 75 (1950).
5 See, e.g., Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294, 297, 532 S.W.2d 741, 743 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229
Ark. 411, 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). For a better understanding of the term "partisan coloring," see
note 16 infra.
6 May v. Daniels, 359 Ark. 100, 105, 194 S.W.3d 771, 776 (2004).
7 Becker v. Riviere, 270 Ark. 219, 226, 604 S.W.2d 555, 558 (1980) (internal citations omitted).
8 Lange v. Martin, 2016 Ark. 337, 500 S.W.3d 154, at n. 2.
9 Id. at 9, 500 S.W.3d at 159.
10 Wilson v. Martin, 2016 Ark. 334,
9, 500 S.W.3d 160, 167.
11 Id, 500 S.W.3d at 167.
12 Baileyv. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277, 285, 884 S.W.2d 938, 942 (1994). Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
Opinion No. 2017-041
Page 5
same time, however, a ballot title must be brief and concise; 13 otherwise voters
could run afoul of Ark. Code Ann. § 7-5-309's five-minute limit in voting booths
when other voters are waiting in line. 14 The ballot title is not required to be perfect,
nor is it reasonable to expect the title to cover or anticipate every possible legal
argument the proposed measure might evoke.15 The title, however, must be "free
of any misleading tendency whether by amplification, omission, or fallacy, and it
must not be tinged with partisan coloring."16 The ballot title must be honest and
impartial, 17 and it must convefi an intelligible idea of the scope and significance of
a proposed change in the law. 8
Furthermore, the Court has confirmed that a proposed measure cannot be approved
if the text of the proposal itself contributes to confusion and disconnect between
the language in the popular name and the ballot title and the language in the
proposed measure.19 The Court concluded that "internal inconsistencies would
inevitably lead to confusion in drafting a popular name and ballot title and to
confusion in the ballot title itself. "20 Where the effects of a proposed measure on
current law are unclear or ambiguous, it is impossible for me to perform my
statutory duty to the satisfaction of the Arkansas Supreme Court without ( 1)
clarification or removal of the ambiguities in the proposal itself, and (2)
conformance of the popular name and ballot title to the newly worded proposal.
13 See Ark. Code Ann. § 7-9-107(b).
14 Bailey, 318 Ark. at 284, 884 S.W.2d at 944.
15 Id. at 293, 844 S.W.2d at 946-47.
16 Id. at 284, 884 S.W.2d at 942. Language "tinged with partisan coloring" has been identified by
the Arkansas Supreme Court as language that "creates a fatally misleading tendency" (Crochet v.
Priest, 326 Ark. 338, 347, 931 S.W.2d 128, 133 (1996)) or that "gives the voter only the
impression that the proponents of the proposed amendment wish to convey of the activity
represented by the words." (Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 241, 249, 884
S.W.2d 605, 610 (1994)).
17 Becker v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 482, 489, 798 S.W.2d 71, 74 (1990).
18 Christian Civic Action Committee, 318 Ark. at 245, 884 S.W.2d at 607 (internal quotations
omitted).
19 Cf Roberts v. Priest, 341 Ark. 813, 825, 20 S.W.3d 376, 382 (2000).
20 Id. Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
Opinion No. 2017-041
Page 6
It is my op1mon, based on the above precepts, that a number of additions or
changes to your ballot title are necessary in order to more fully and correctly
summarize your proposal. I cannot, however, at this time, fairly or completely
summarize the effect of your proposed measure to the electorate in a popular name
or ballot title without the resolution of the ambiguities in the text of the measure
itself. And thus I cannot determine precisely what changes to the ballot title are
necessary to fully and correctly summarize your proposal. It is therefore not
appropriate, in my opinion, for me to try to substitute and certify a more suitable
and correct popular name and ballot title pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 7-9-107(b).
Instead, you may, if you wish, redesign the proposed measure and ballot title, and
then resubmit for certification. In order to aid your redesign, I highlight below the
more concerning ambiguities in the text of your proposal.

  1. Section 3(g) of your proposed amendment
    concerns the transport of four or more pounds of
    marijuana and marijuana products. This section
    requires a "transport pass" in order to authorize a
    "business or person who is 21 years of age or older to
    transport recreational marijuana and or products
    produced therefrom" on any public road in Arkansas.
    The transport pass "shall provide a name of driver,
    Arkansas driver's license Identification number, and a
    date of expiration."
    There are ambiguities in Section 3(g) caused by the simultaneous use of
    "business," "person," and "driver." It is unclear if the "name of driver" appearing
    on the transport pass must match the name of the "person" who initially requested
    the pass (either in his own name or on behalf of a business). Thus, it is unclear if a
    "person" could be issued a transport pass for another individual who would be the
    eventual "driver," or if a transport pass may only display the name of the "person"
    who requested the pass from the sheriff. Given that statewide transportation of
    large quantities of marijuana and products produced from marijuana is of
    significance to voters, these ambiguities in Section 3(g) must be clarified in order
    to ensure that a ballot title accurately summarizes the transport-pass framework.
  2. Section 4( c )(3) states that all "products produced
    from recreational marijuana being sold" must be
    "designed and packaged pursuant to section 5 of this
    amendment." Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
    Opinion No. 2017-041
    Page 7
    It is unclear if the design and packaging requirements apply strictly to marijuana
    products "being sold," or if these requirements apply as well to marijuana products
    distributed without remuneration. The manner in which recreational marijuana is
    sold and distributed is crucial to a fair summary of the amendment in a ballot title.
    This ambiguity must be clarified before I can certify a title that accurately
    describes the amendment's requirements for design and packaging.
  3. Section 8 provides that "each and every criminal
    record in this state shall be expunged of such
    marijuana-related convictions if the violation( s)
    occurred prior to the effective date of this
    amendment."
    It is unclear which convictions qualify under Section 8 as "such marijuana
    convictions" that must be expunged. On the one hand, a reasonable voter might
    believe that the intent is to expunge current marijuana-related convictions that
    "occurred prior to the effective date." Under this interpretation, a marijuana-
    related conviction would only be expunged if (1) the conviction occurred prior to
    the amendment's effective date, and (2) the sentence associated with the
    conviction was being served when the amendment took effect. On the other hand,
    a reasonable voter might conclude that if a person were serving a marijuana-
    related sentence when the amendment took effect, each and every marijuana-
    related conviction on that person's record must be expunged, even those
    convictions with already-completed sentences. The effect of the proposed
    amendment on criminal convictions is a matter of great importance to Arkansas
    voters. This ambiguity must be clarified before I can accurately summarize the
    expungement requirement in a ballot title.
  4. Section 10 enumerates criminal penalties that
    may be imposed against any "person or business who
    violates the provisions pursuant to this amendment."
    A reasonable voter would be unsure if the criminal-penalties section is meant to
    apply to the State of Arkansas (or to one of the State's subdivisions). That is,
    Section 10 is ambiguous with respect to whether State actors could be held liable
    for engaging in conduct prohibited by the amendment. And it is unclear whether,
    and to what extent, the criminal-penalties section is intended as a waiver of the
    State's sovereign immunity. These ambiguities are noteworthy especially in light
    of the legalization of medicinal marijuana in Arkansas. Larry B. Morris, Sponsor
    Opinion No. 2017-041
    Page 8
    CONCLUSION
    The ambiguities noted above are not necessarily all the ambiguities contained in
    your proposal, but they are sufficiently serious to require me to reject your popular
    name and ballot title. I am unable to substitute language in a ballot title for your
    measure due to these ambiguities. Further, additional ambiguities may come to
    light on review of any revisions of your proposal.
    My office, in the certification of ballot titles and popular names, does not address
    the merits, philosophy, or ideology of proposed measures. I have no constitutional
    role in the shaping or drafting of such measures. My statutory mandate is
    embodied only in Ark. Code Ann. § 7-9-107, and my duty is to the electorate.
    Based on what has been submitted, my statutory duty is to reject your proposed
    ballot title for the foregoing reasons and instruct you to redesign the proposed
    measure and ballot title.21 You may resubmit your proposed act along with a
    proposed popular name and ballot title at your convenience.
    Sincerely, ~-
    ~ ~
    LESLIE RUTLEDGE
    Attorney General
    21 Ark. Code Ann.§ 7-9-107(c). THE ARKANSAS DECRIMINALIZATION OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA AMENDMENT
    AN AMENDMENT TO THE ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION CONCERNING THE MARIJUANA PLANT,
    PROVIDING THAT THE CULTIVATION, PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, SALE, POSSESSION, AND USE
    OF MARIJUANA AND PRODUCTS PRODUCED THEREFROM FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES BY
    ADULTS 21 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED UNDER STATE LAW;
    RECOGNIZING THAT SUCH ACTIVITIES REMAIN UNLAWFUL UNDER FEDERAL LAW; PROVIDING FOR
    THE RELEASE FROM INCARCERATION, PROBATION, OR PAROLE OF All PERSONS WHOSE
    CURRENT AND ONLY CONVICTION(S) IN WHICH THEY ARE SERVING WERE OF STATE LAWS
    PERTAINING TO THE CULTIVATION, PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, SALE, AND POSSESSION OF
    MARIJUANA, POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA PARAPHERNALIA, AND OR THE UNLAWFUL USE OF
    COMMUNICATION DEVICES TO SELL MARIJUANA, AND THE EXPUNGEMENT OF EACH AND EVERY
    CRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE STATE RELATING TO SUCH CONVICTION(S); DEFINING RECREATIONAL
    MARIJUANA CONTAINING MORE THAN 0.3% THC; PERMITTING THE CULTIVATION, PRODUCTION,
    DISTRIBUTION, AND SALE OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA BY ANY BUSINESS OR PERSON 21
    YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER; PROVIDING THAT A BUSINESS AND ANYONE 21 YEARS OF AGE OR
    OLDER MAY CULTIVATE, PRODUCE, AND SELL MARIJUANA AND PRODUCTS PRODUCED
    THEREFROM FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING THAT A PERSON OR BUSINESS MAY
    CULTIVATE UP TO 25 MATURE AND 25 NON MATURE MARIJUANA PLANTS IN A LOCATION NOT
    SUBJECT TO PUBLIC VIEW WITHOUT OPTICAL AID; PROVIDING THAT THE LOCATION OF 25 OR
    MORE CULTIVATING MARIJUANA PLANTS IS PUT ON RECORD WITH THE COUNTY SHERIFF'S
    OFFICE; PERMITTING THE TRANSPORT OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA UPON ANY PUBLIC
    HIGHWAY OR STREET PROVIDED IF THE WEIGHT OF TRANSPORT EXCEEDS 4LBS OR MORE A
    TRANSPORT PASS IS OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; PROVIDING THAT SALES
    OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA WILL BE SUBJECT TO EXISTING SALES TAXES AND AN
    ADDITIONAL 5% RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX AND A LOCAL SALES TAX OF 2%;
    PERMITTING ANY BUSINESS THAT IS 1500 FEET AWAY OR MORE FROM A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
    SCHOOL, CHURCH, OR DAYCARE MAY SELL RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA TO ANY PERSON 21
    YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER; PROVIDING THAT THE RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA THAT IS SOLD IN
    THE FORM OF EDIBLES OR DRINKABLES (A)IS NOT DESIGNED TO APPEAL TO CHILDREN; (B)
    SHALL NOT EXCEED 10 MILLIGRAMS OF THC PER SERVING, AND (C) LABELING OR PACKAGING
    MUST PROVIDE PRODUCT INFORMATION; PROVIDING THAT THE MANUFACTURE, POSSESSION,
    PURCHASE, SALE, AND DISTRIBUTION OF MARIJUANA PARAPHERNALIA IS LAWFUL UNDER STATE
    LAW; AND PROVIDING THAT THE AMENDMENT (A) IS NOT INTENDED TO REQUIRE EMPLOYERS TO
    PERMIT ACTIVITIES RELATING TO RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA IN THE WORKPLACE, (B) IS NOT
    INTENDED TO PERMIT DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MARIJUANA, (C) IS NOT INTENDED TO
    PERMIT THE TRANSFER OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA TO ANYONE UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE,
    (D) DOES NOT PERMIT ANYONE UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE TO CULTIVATE, PRODUCE, SELL,
    POSSESS, OR USE RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA AND; (E) DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM
    APPOINTING A REGULATORY BODY TO REGULATE THE CULTIVATION, PRODUCTION,
    DISTRIBUTION AND SALE OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA PURSUANT TO THE AMENDMENT AND
    (F) IS NOT INTENDED TO LIMIT ANY PRIVILEGES OR RIGHTS OF A QUALIFYING PATIENT,
    CAREGIVER, PHYSICIAN, OR, ANY LICENSE ENTITY PURSUANT TO THE ARKANSAS MEDICAL
    MARIJUANA AMENDMENT OF 2016. Section 1. Short Title.
    This is an amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that shall be called "The Arkansas Decriminalization of
    Recreational Marijuana Amendment".
    Section 2 Effective Date.
    Effective November 7th, 2018 the cultivation, production, distribution, sale, possession, and use of the
    cannabis plant (genus Cannabis) as it pertains to adult use of marijuana for recreational purposes shall be
    made lawful in every geographic area of every county of this state under Arkansas law, and shall not be an
    offense, or be a basis for seizure or forfeiture of assets pursuant to the Arkansas Uniformed Controlled
    Substance Act.
    Section 3. Definitions.
    The following terms are defined for the purposes of this amendment:
    (a) "Driving under the influence of marijuana" means operating a motorized vehicle on any public road,
    highway, or street when the Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (L19THC) content of the operator's blood exceeds
    fourteen nanograms per milliliter (14ng/ml).
    (b) "Marijuana" or "Recreational Marijuana" means any part of the cannabis plant (genus Cannabis), living or
    not, and when harvested in its mature plant stage contains greater than three tenths of one percent (0.3%), by
    dry weight, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (L19THC), and is cultivated to be used as an intoxicant for recreational
    purposes.
    (c) "Marijuana paraphernalia" means any equipment, utensils, products, and materials which are used,
    intended for use, or designed for use in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing,
    compounding, converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, repackaging,
    containing, or concealing recreational marijuana, or for ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing recreational
    marijuana into the human body.
    (d) "Mature marijuana plants" means recreational marijuana plants that are in the flowering stage and
    producing colas.
    (e) "Products produced from recreational marijuana" or "products produced therefrom" means items and
    substances manufactured from recreational marijuana, containing more than three tenths of one percent
    (0.3%) delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (L19THC) and is used as an intoxicant for recreational purposes, and is
    consumed into the human body in the form of food, drink, vapor, or smoke.
    (f) "Remuneration" means an act in which money is being paid to purchase recreational marijuana and
    products produced therefrom for recreational purposes.
    (g) "Transport Pass" means a permit provided by a County Sheriff of the state, to permit a business or person
    who is twenty-one (21) years of age or older to transport recreational marijuana and or products produced
    therefrom that weigh four pounds (4 lbs) or more on any public road, highway, or street. Each pass shall
    provide the name of driver, Arkansas driver's license Identification number, and a date of expiration. A
    transport pass shall be valid for three (3) days and cost five dollars ($5.00).
    Section 4 The regulation of recreational marijuana.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the following acts by any business, or person twenty-one (21)
    years of age or older, regarding recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom shall not be an
    offense under Arkansas law, or be a basis for seizure or forfeiture of assets pursuant to The Uniform
    Controlled Substances Act:
    (a) may have cultivating up to twenty-five (25) mature marijuana plants, and up to twenty-five (25) non
    mature plants for recreational purposes provided that:
    (1) Recreational marijuana is cultivated in a location where the plant(s) is (are) not subject to public
    view without the use of binoculars, aircraft, or other optical aids on property owned by the business or person(s), or with the consent of the business or person(s) who owns the property,
    and
    (2) The location where more than twenty-five (25) plants is being cultivated is placed on record with
    the county sheriffs office in the county in which the plants are being grown.
    (b) may transport recreational marijuana plants and products produced therefrom on any public road,
    highway, or street provided that:
    (1) If the weight of the plants and, or products produced therefrom is four pounds (4 lbs) or more a
    transport pass is obtained from the county sheriff where the plants or products produced
    therefrom is being transported from prior to transport.
    (c) may produce, distribute, and sell recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom to any
    business or person 21 years of age or older for recreational purposes, provided that:
    ( 1) The buyer provides proof of age with any valid state identification card or any state driver's
    license prior to purchase.
    (2) The location where recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom is being sold is not
    located within one thousand five hundred feet (1,500') of a public or private school, church, or
    daycare center, and
    (3) All products produced from recreational marijuana being sold is designed and packaged
    pursuant to section 5 of this amendment.
    Section 5. Recreational marijuana product design, serving size, and packaging.
    (a) All edible and drinkable products produced from recreational marijuana that is sold by any business or
    person 21 years of age or older shall;
    (1) Shall not be designed to be appealing to children or easily confused with commercially sold candy
    or foods that do not contain marijuana.
    (2) Shall be produced and sold with a standardized dosage not to exceed ten (10) milligrams of
    delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (~9THC) per serving.
    (3) Shall be delineated or scored into standardized serving sizes if the product contains more than one
    serving and is in solid form.
    (4) Shall be homogenized to ensure uniform disbursement of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (~
    9
    THC)
    throughout the product.
    (5) Shall provide information on the packaging or labeling to enable the informed consumption of such
    product, including the potential effects of the product, and directions as to how to consume the product.
    (b) All smokable and vaporizable products produced from recreational marijuana that is sold by any business
    or person 21 years of age or older;
    (1) Shall provide information on the packaging or labeling to enable the informed consumption of such
    product, including the delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (~9THC) content, potential effects of the product, and
    directions as to how to consume the product.
    (c) All recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom that is distributed without remuneration shall be
    exempt from the design, packaging and labeling requirements of this section.
    Section 6. Marijuana paraphernalia
    Any business or person twenty-one (21) years of age or older may manufacture, possess, and purchase
    marijuana paraphernalia, or may sell marijuana paraphernalia to another business or person who is twenty-one
    (21) years of age or older, providing that such paraphernalia sold that contains recreational marijuana is
    designed, packaged, and labeled pursuant to section 5 of this amendment.
    Section 7. Employers, driving, minors, and regulatory body (a) Nothing in this amendment is intended to require an employer to permit or accommodate the cultivation,
    production, distribution, sale, possession, or use of recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom in
    the workplace or to affect the ability of employers to have policies restricting the use of recreational marijuana
    by employees.
    (b) Nothing in this amendment is intended to permit driving under the influence of marijuana.
    (c) Nothing in this amendment is intended to permit the transfer of recreational marijuana or products produced
    therefrom, with or without remuneration, to a person under the age of twenty-one (21 ).
    ( d) Nothing in this amendment is intended to permit a person under the age of twenty-one (21) to cultivate,
    produce, sell, possess, or use recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom.
    (e) Nothing in this amendment is intended to permit the cultivation, production, distribution, or sale, of any other
    substance that is controlled or prohibited by the state pursuant to the Arkansas Uniform Controlled Substances
    Act.
    (f) Nothing in this amendment prohibits the state from appointing a regulatory body to regulate the cultivation,
    production, distribution, and sale of recreational marijuana and products produced therefrom pursuant to this
    amendment.
    (g) Nothing in this amendment is intended to limit any privileges or rights of a qualifying patient, caregiver,
    physician, or licensed entity in regards to medical marijuana pursuant to the Arkansas Medical Marijuana
    Amendment.
    Section 8. Non-violent marijuana offenders and criminal record expungement.
    All persons currently serving incarceration, probation, or parole in this state, whose current and only
    conviction(s) to which they are now serving were due to violating state laws as they pertain to the cultivation,
    production, distribution, sale, and possession of marijuana, possession of marijuana paraphernalia.and or the
    unlawful use of a communication device(s) as it relates to the sale of marijuana, and whose violation(s)
    occurred prior to the effective date of this amendment shall be released, and each and every criminal record in
    this state shall be expunged of such marijuana related convictions if the violations occurred prior to the
    effective date of this amendment.
    Section 9. Taxation and distribution of proceeds from the sale of recreational marijuana
    (a) The following taxes shall be imposed upon the purchase of recreational marijuana in Arkansas:
    (1) The Arkansas State Sales and Use Tax,
    (2) a five percent (5%) recreational marijuana excise tax, and
    (3) a two percent (2%) local sales tax.
    (d) The distribution of tax revenues received by the Department of Finance and Administration from the sale of
    recreational marijuana under this amendment may be determined by the general assembly.
    Section 10. Penalties
    Any person or business who violates the provisions pursuant to this amendment the following penalties may be
    imposed:
    (a.) First offense: Upon conviction is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor, a penalty no greater than
    five-hundred dollars ($500) shall be imposed, up to thirty (30) days in jail.
    (b.) Second offense: Upon conviction is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor, a penalty no greater than
    five-hundred dollars ($500) shall be imposed, up to thirty (30) days in jail.
    (c.) Third offense: upon conviction is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor, a penalty no greater than
    one-thousand dollars ($1,000) shall be imposed, and up to ninety (90) days in jail. Section 11. Conflicting Laws.
    The provisions of this Amendment are hereby declared to be severable and self-executing, and except where
    otherwise indicated in this Amendment, shall supersede all conflicting state and local laws, charters,
    regulations, and any and all other provisions in conflict with this Amendment. If any provision of this
    Amendment, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is declared invalid by any
    court for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Amendment.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2017 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Arkansas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.